SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1412

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Ram Kumar Chandan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr Abhishek Khanna, GP, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 06.06.2022 passed by the respondent No.4 and directions to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that against the order dated 07.06.2022 qua removal from service, petitioner has preferred an appeal dated 14.09.2022, however, till date, the said appeal has not been decided by the respondents.

3. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondents to decide the appeal dated 14.09.2023 preferred by the petitioner within four weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within one week thereafter with a reasoned order.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.

5. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representations, he may approach the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top