SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4685

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, J.
Raksha Devi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
W.P.(Cr) 682 of 2023
Decided On : 03-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Dhruva Bhagat, Advocate (DHCLSC) along with petitioner in-person.
Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) along with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya and Mr. Shivesh Kaushik, Advocates for the State with S.I. Yashpal, P.S.: R.K. Puram.

The well-being, safety, and welfare of the minor are paramount in determining custody arrangements.

Headnote:

Habeas Corpus - Custody of Minor - The court restored the care and custody of the minor to her mother, directing her to ensure the well-being, safety, and welfare of the minor, including continuing her education.

Fact of the Case:

The minor girl, who was the subject of the petition, was produced before the court and expressed her inclination to return to her maternal home. The mother sought restoration of the care and custody of the minor.

Finding of the Court:

The court decided to restore the care and custody of the minor to her mother, accepting the undertaking provided by the mother to ensure the well-being, safety, and welfare of the minor.

Issues: Custody of the minor girl, compliance with the standing order, and the relief of habeas corpus.

Ratio Decidendi: The well-being, safety, and welfare of the minor are paramount, and the court has the authority to restore custody to the mother if it is in the best interest of the minor.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the care and custody of the minor was restored to her mother.

JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. (Open Court)

1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Cr.P.C), has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:

    "A. Issue Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondent to produce the minor girl aged about 16 years before the Hon'ble Court and release her from the illegal detention of the Respondent.

    B. To Issue Writ of Mandamus to Respondent as the case may be to take immediate steps/measures to find the minor child D/o Raksha Devi in compliance of the standing order 252/2019 passed by the worthy the then commissioner of Police and to release her from the illegal detention of any unknown person who had abducted her.

    C. Pass any other or further order(s) which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case be allowed in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondent."

2. A status report dated 01.05.2023, made by Inspector Arvind Pratap Singh, SHO, P.S.: R.K. Puram, Delhi, has been filed on behalf of the State.

3. A perusal of the said status report reflects that the MLC (bearing No.37099) of Ms. `S' was conducted on 30.04.2023 at the Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. Further, the statement of Ms. `S', under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C), has been recorded on 01.05.2023, by the concerned Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, following which Ms. `S' was also produced before the concerned Child Welfare Committee, on 01.05.2023, itself.

4. Be that as it may, Ms. `S', the hitherto missing minor daughter of the petitioner, has been produced before this Court by S.I. Yashpal, P.S.: R.K.Puram, Delhi, from the Sakhi One Stop Centre, Malviya Nagar, Delhi, where she was currently lodged since 30.04.2023, pursuant to the order of the CWC and we have interacted with her.

5. Ms. `S' has expressed her inclination to return to her maternal home situated at 35A, Block D-11, Jeevan Park, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi. Ms. Raksha Devi, the mother of Ms. `S'/the petitioner herein, seeks restoration of the care and custody of Ms. `S', to her.

6. In view of the foregoing, the only course of action that commends itself to us, is to restore the care and custody of Ms. 'S', to her mother, forthwith. Ms. `S' shall no longer be required to be produced before the concerned CWC.

7. Ms. Raksha Devi, who is present before this Court in-person, undertakes that, she will take every step to secure the well-being, safety and welfare of her minor daughter, including but not limited to ensuring that she continues with her education, in accordance with law.

8. The undertaking furnished on behalf of Ms. Raksha Devi, as stated above, is hereby accepted, directing her to comply therewith, without demur.

9. Further, Ms. Raksha Devi is also at liberty to approach the concerned CWC, to seek counselling for her minor daughter, if so advised.

10. In view of the foregoing, the relief of habeas corpus prayed for, in the present proceedings, stands satisfied.

11. No further relief is prayed for.

12. The writ petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

13. A copy of this order be uploaded on the website of this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top