IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Sarita – Appellant
Versus
The State & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(Cr) 926 of 2023
Decided On : 24-05-2023
Habeas Corpus - Child Custody - The court allowed the writ petition for habeas corpus, directing the respondents to locate and produce the petitioner's missing daughter. The court also provided security measures for the petitioner and her family.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the production of her missing daughter, who was found and restored to her custody by the Child Welfare Committee.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the writ petition and directed the police to provide security to the petitioner's daughter and her immediate family.
Issues: Habeas Corpus, Child Custody, Security Measures
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the relief of habeas corpus was satisfied as the missing daughter was restored to the petitioner's custody. The court also directed the police to provide security measures for the petitioner and her family.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the court directed the police to provide security to the petitioner's daughter and her immediate family.
JUDGMENT
Siddharth Mridul, J. (Open Court)
1. The present writ petition has been taken up on urgent mentioning, by Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State.
2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:
"It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to:
a. Issue a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus or any other writ, order or direction as may be deemed appropriate by this Hon'ble Court directing the Respondents to locate and produce the daughter of the Petitioner, namely Ms. V, aged 16 years, resident of D-17/328, Sector-3, Rohini- 110085, New Delhi before this Hon'ble Court, and
b. Pass any other or further orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case"
3. At the outset, Mr. Shivek Trehan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states, that a charge-sheet has also been filed in the present proceeding, in FIR No. 29/2023, dated 16.01.2023, P.S.: South Rohini, under Sections 363/366/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 6/17 of the The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.
4. The Delhi Police has handed-up a status report dated 23.05.2023, made by SHO, P.S.: South Rohini, along with a copy of the MLC and statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in the Court today. Let the same be taken on record.
5. We are informed at the Bar, that Child Welfare Committee (CWC)- Avantika, has, on 23.05.2023, restored the care and custody of Ms. `V', to her mother namely, Ms. Sarita, the petitioner herein, who is also present before this Court, today.
6. Ms. `V' was also escorted for her Medico Legal Examination (MLC bearing no. 132), on 21.05.2023, conducted by Dr. Ritu Singh at Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital, Delhi.
7. A perusal of the said status report reflects that Ms. V's statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been recorded before the competent Magistrate, Mahila Court, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, on 22.05.2023, in FIR No. 29/2023, P.S.: South Rohini, under Sections 363/366/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 6/17 of the The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.
8. Ms. `V', the hitherto missing approximately 17-years old daughter (Date of Birth: 25.08.2006, as mentioned in the Birth Certificate dated 30.08.2006, issued by the GNCTD) of Ms. Sarita, the petitioner herein, is present before this Court, along with her mother, the petitioner herein.
9. In view of the foregoing, the relief of habeas corpus prayed for in the present proceeding stands satisfied.
10. No further relief is prayed for.
11. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed and disposed of, with a direction to the SHO, P.S.: South Rohini, to provide adequate security to Ms. `V' and her immediate family, in case of any threat or apprehension expressed by them qua the status of the accused persons in the subject FIR. The Delhi Police is further directed to furnish to the petitioner (the mother of Ms. `V') with the cell-phone number of the SHO, South Rohini (Contact No.- 8750870328) as also cell-phone number of the concerned beat constable (Mr. Rakesh, Contact No.- 9278046076) and of the lady constable (S.I. Esha, Contact No.- 7020623047), who may be available to Ms. `V' and her immediate family, in the case of any eventuality.
12. Directed accordingly.
13. The date already fixed, i.e., 31.05.2023, stands cancelled.
14. Dasti.
15. Copy of the Judgment be uploaded on the website of the Court, forthwith.
The court upheld the principle of habeas corpus and directed the police to provide security measures for the petitioner and her family.
The court emphasized the principle of Habeas Corpus and the importance of investigating the circumstances of a minor going missing.
The well-being, safety, and welfare of the minor are paramount in determining custody arrangements.
The court exercises its extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to direct the production of an individual in a Habeas Corpus petition to ensure safety and confirm their whereabouts, especia....
The court's primary concern was the prompt and regular updates on the investigation into the missing minor daughter and the directive to produce her before the magistrate if she is traced or rescued.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.