Back
MINI PUSHKARNA
Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mini Pushkarna, J. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.07.2018 passed by the learned Financial Commissioner, Delhi in Appeal no. 167/2016. The petitioner prays for restoration of order dated 04.04.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, District North, Delhi and for remanding back the matter to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM)/Revenue Assistant (RA), Narela, Delhi for fresh hearing and passing a speaking order in the case.
2. Facts as given in the petition are as follows: One Khemchand, the paternal grandfather of the petitioner herein, was the recorded owner of agricultural land measuring 132 bighas 14 biswas situated in the revenue estate of Village Holambi Khurd, Delhi to the extent of his share i.e. 58 bighas 1 biswas. The said Khemchand had one son, Kali Ram, father of the petitioner herein.
3. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that after the death of Khemchand, grandfather of the petitioner, his father Kaliram became owner of the said land measuring 58 bighas 1 biswas. Mutation to that effect was sanctioned in the name of Kaliram vide mutation no. 107 on 25.02.1937. It is stated that Kaliram was only 6 months old at the tim
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, and the interpretation of its provisions regarding bhumidari rights, res judicata, and the lim....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a challenge to a Bhumidhari Certificate filed 50 years later was grossly barred by delay and laches, and that the Appellant, who was not in ph....
The legal proceedings under the DLR Act would not be maintainable in an urbanised area, and the petitioner was granted liberty to approach a Civil Court for the declaration of bhumidari rights.
The legal principle established is the need for a time-bound resolution of proceedings under the Delhi Land Reforms Act to prevent infringement of legal rights.
The applicability of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, in determining the cause of action and limitation for a suit.
Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act would apply only if there is an existence of a Joint Hindu Family and a coparcenary property.
The judgment established that the issuance and extension of Patta, as well as the fulfillment of conditions for land ownership, are crucial in determining the rights of the petitioner.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
