IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Deepak Yadav & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State (Govt. of Nct) & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(Crl.) 1588 of 2023
Decided On : 14-07-2023
Quashing - Criminal Procedure - Section 308/34 IPC - Section 482 CrPC
Fact of the Case:
The petition sought quashing of FIR No.1235/2016 registered under Section 308/34 IPC. The incident involved a quarrel over property resulting in assault and subsequent amicable settlement between the parties.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the closely related parties, the amicable settlement, and the bleak chances of conviction. It imposed a cost on the petitioners and ultimately quashed the FIR and related proceedings.
Issues: Quashing of FIR under Section 308/34 IPC, Amicable Settlement, Imposition of Cost
Ratio Decidendi: The court may quash criminal proceedings when chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations. The court may impose costs on the petitioners in appropriate cases.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and related proceedings, imposing a cost on the petitioners.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 14827/2023
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(Crl.) 1588/2023
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. PC seeking quashing of FIR No.1235/2016 registered at PS Samaypur Badli under Section 308/34 IPC.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR No.1235/2016was lodged on the statement of Mr. Charan Jeet Yadav/Respondent no.2. The Respondent no.2 and the Petitioners are close family relatives and the quarrel in question was over a property. It is alleged that on 04.12.2016 at 7:30pm, the Petitioner no.1 called the Respondent no.2 and abused and threatened him. Thereafter at 9:30pm, the 3 Petitioners assaulted the Respondent no.2 using a brick, an empty glass bottle, an iron angle and a knife. It is further alleged that the efforts of the Respondent no.2 to run away were of no avail and consequently, after the petitioners left him beaten up, he was taken to the hospital by his servant and tenant.
3. However, due to intervention of relatives, friends and renowned personalities of Samaypur Village, the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably vide Mutual Agreement dated 28.03.2023 with the following terms and conditions:
And Whereas the expressions of all the parties mentioned above shall include their heirs, successors, executors, administrators and legal assigns of the respective parties.
AND WHEREAS both the parties had agreed that the Second Party/Shivdhan Singh Yadav has to give 16 feet street from front to end to the First Party and for that he has to demolish his front 6 feet and his 2 shops in the inner street 2-4 feet on 40/10 Main Bawana Road, Samaypur Delhi-110042 by: 14/05/2023, from the rear side, both the parties can bring their wall forward upto 61 feet. If Second Party does not give 16 feet road by demolishing his shops and front, then the first party/ Deepak Yadav can do so and Second Party or his members cannot stop him or cannot take any legal action against him.
AND WHEREAS the First Party will be given Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lacs only) cash for settlement out of 18 Lakhs by 25/03/2023 for can loan default, after that First Party cannot ask for any new money from the Second Party or his family against can loan default for BMW X5 Regn. No. DL-4CAV-1381. Both the parties had agreed that 16 Feet common road will remain forever and no one can do any new connection on that road, nor can anyone challenge this decision. There can be no new division of 40/10 Main Bawana Road, Samaipur Delhi-110042 property in future, neither nor we not any of heirs can cheat.
Apart from this anyone can do construction on his remaining property at any time, others cannot stop his work, nor can any one complaint.
If Second Party does not give 16 feet path to the first party and does not break both his shops and front or First Party/Deepak Yadav makes some new demand, then legal action can be taken against each other.
Both the families will take back the complaints made against each other, whether it is a Civil Court Case, a Criminal Court Case or a police case or any FIR.
This decision has been taken in front of 03 big people of the Samaypur Village and they are the witnesses of this decision and their details are below
i) Narain Singh Yadav
ii) Surender Pal Yadav
iii) Satish Yadav
Both family names & details
i) Shivdhan Singh Yadav S/O Late Ganpat Singh Yadav
ii) Himanshu Yadav & Lakshay Yadav both sons of Shri Chanderjeet Yadav S/O Shivdhan Singh Yadav
iii) Mishri Devi Wife of Shivdhan Singh Yadav
iv) Madhubala Yadav W/o Chander Jeet Yadav
i) Deepak Yadav & Puneet Yadav S/O Late Kanwar Pal Yadav
ii) Uma Yadav W/O Late Kanwar Pal Yadav
Both the parties had agreed that First Party front 40 ft. & back Ft. & second Party front 45 Feet & Back 44 Feet & 16 Feet Common path which 92 Ft. Length will be in the middle
AND WHEREAS both the parties mutually agreed on all the terms and conditions this agreement as mentioned
Courts may quash criminal proceedings when chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations, and may impose costs on the petitioners in appropriate ....
The court can quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C if an amicable settlement is reached and continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings under section 482 Cr.P.C. when the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The court emphasized the importance of amicably settling trivial disputes and considered the nature of injuries and circumstances in deciding to quash the FIRs.
Cases arising from matrimonial differences should be put to rest if parties reach an amicable settlement, and the nature of injuries and circumstances should be considered in determining the quashabi....
The court has the power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when a settlement between parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a crim....
The court may exercise power under section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings when the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The court may exercise power under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash criminal proceedings when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak, and a settlement between the parties would lead to better rel....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings based on an alleged settlement, with the aim of maintaini....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.