JYOTI SINGH
Naresh Kumar Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
Cambridge Foundation School – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J.
1. By this writ petition, Petitioner assails the impugned order dated 29.11.2016 passed by the learned Delhi School Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as `DST') in Appeal No. 17/2011 as also to set aside the impugned orders dated 14.03.2011 and 18.03.2011 passed by Respondent No. 1/Cambridge Foundation School (hereinafter referred to as the `School'). Writ of mandamus is sought directing the School to reinstate the Petitioner with all consequential service benefits. Respondent No. 3 is Director of Education (hereinafter referred to as the `DoE').
2. Facts to the extent necessary and as captured in the writ petition are that Petitioner was appointed as Lab Assistant in the School in 1984 and subsequently as TGT (Science) in 1988. Since the date of his joining till December, 2009, there were no complaints against the Petitioner and the results of the students in classes taught by him were consistently good. Upon implementation of 6th CPC w.e.f. 01.01.2006, pay scales of the School employees including the Petitioner were revised but the School did not release arrears of salaries/emoluments, despite repeated demands. Several letters were written by the Petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.