SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Managing Committee of the Pinnacle School – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to order of tribunal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of disciplinary actions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. petitioner's arguments on tribunal's observations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. respondent's arguments against the petition. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. key issue for consideration in appeal. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
6. failings of dac in the process. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
7. approval of doe and its implications. (Para 32 , 33)
8. final decision to uphold tribunal's ruling. (Para 37 , 38 , 39)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:

    "In view of the facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that the present writ petition be allowed and the impugned order dated 09.07.2021 passed by Shri Dilbag Singh Punia, Presiding Officer, Delhi School Tribunal, Lucknow Road, Timar Pur, Delhi-110054 in Appeal Case No. 73 of 2013 titled as Mrs. Bindu Khanna Vs. Managing Committee, The Pinnacle School, may be quashed.

    Any other order this Hon'ble Court feels appropriate in the facts of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner school and against the Res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top