Back
V. KAMESWAR RAO, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Indian Council of Agricultural Research – Appellant
Versus
Yugal Kishore Sah – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)--The challenge in this petition is to an interim order dated June 30, 2023 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (`Tribunal', for short) in Original Application NO. 1729/2023 (`OA', for short) whereby the Tribunal has stated as under:
"Learned counsel for R-2 and 3 submits that he has already filed the reply. Even though it may be a short reply, he submits that the same may be adopted as a reply to the OA. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed a time of one week to file rejoinder.
Mr. S.N. Verma, learned counsel for Union of India which is represented through both the Ministry of Personnel and Ministry of Agriculture, submits that no separate reply is required to be filed on behalf of Union of India. However, they shall be providing necessary inputs to the Ministry of Agriculture to enable them to file reply, if they so wish. Learned counsel for R-2 seeks and is allowed liberty to file a supplementary reply, if situation so warrants, after obtaining the necessary inputs.
Learned counsel for the private respondents assures that he shall be filing reply within ten days. He further submits that he is separately filing another MA
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the seniority list and the implications of promotions made pursuant to LDCE for the year 2021-22, highlighting the importance of adhering ....
Merit-based determination of inter se seniority for Limited Departmental Competitive Examination candidates must align with the established rules and policies, distinguishing them from direct recruit....
The inter se seniority of LDCE candidates is determined based on the marks obtained in both LDCE and Basic Professional Course, as per the Scheme and Relegation Policy.
The Tribunal correctly held that approved service for LDCE appointees starts from January 1 of the examination year, not the anticipated vacancy year, ensuring compliance with the Armed Forces Headqu....
Eligibility for promotion under conflicting recruitment rules must prioritize service years and proper seniority lists as determined by precedent.
Promotion – Non-filling of vacancies in promotional post would be prejudicial to interests of administration of any service – Normally, when seniority list is in challenge and a number of vacancies a....
Seniority lists finalized under pre-overruling law (initiation of recruitment process and quota rotation) protected prospectively; ad hoc service does not confer seniority; repeated provisional lists....
Seniority is fixed based on recruitment ratios. Promotions made within the prescribed promotional quota remain regular despite delays in the examination quota. However, diverting quota-based vacancie....
Delayed claims in service matters can unsettle settled positions, making them unmaintainable without necessary parties involved.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
