Back
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Sameer Bajpai – Appellant
Versus
Puneet Kumar Goel – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)
1. This contempt petition has been filed under Section 2 (b) and 16 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, stating that the Respondents herein have failed to comply with the directions issued by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.08.2016 in WP(C) 4162/2016.
2. This order is being passed in continuation of orders dated 18.05.2023 and 23.05.2023.
3. The learned standing counsel for Municipal Corporation of Delhi (`MCD') states at the outset that Dr. Akeel Ahmed, the Executive Engineer (`EE') and Mr. Anil Kumar, Assistant Engineer (`AE') tender an unconditional apology to this Court. He states affidavits of the officials have been filed. He is directed to have the same placed on record.
3.1. He states that the directions issued vide order dated 29.08.2016 now stand complied with.
3.2. He states that after obtaining the standard plan from Delhi Development Authority (`DDA'), demolition was carried out on the building and the flats of the Petitioner and Respondent No.3 now stand at the site as per the standard plan provided by DDA.
3.3. He states that there is unauthorized/illegal construction by the Petitioner on the ter
Compliance with court directions is crucial, and apologies may be accepted in contempt cases. Issues may be made subject to the final outcome of related petitions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
