SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rekha Palli, J.
Air India Limited & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
All India Aircraft Engineers Association & Ors. - Respondents
O.M.P. 33 of 2016, I.A. 10716 of 2016, I.A. 7625 of 2022 and I.A. 14936 of 2023, I.A. 2583 of 2017 and I.A. 16467 of 2019 and I.A. 14937 of 2023, I.A. 3059 of 2022 and O.M.P. 34 of 2016 and I.A. 10718 of 2016 (stay)
Decided On : 08-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Harish N Salve, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Advocate, Mr. Lynn Pereira, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka M.P., Advocate, Ms. Shivangi Sud, Advocate, Ms. Srishti Prakash, Advocate, Mr. Arkaprava Das, Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Shivam Singhania, Advocate, Mr. Azeem Samuel, Advocate, Ms. Mitakshara Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advocate, Mr. Kaustubh Seth, Advocate, Mr. Aditendra Singh, Advocate, Ms. Manjira, Advocate for the Applicant; Mr. Jay Savla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sameer Kumar, Advocate, Mr.Shah Rukh Ahmad, Advocate, Mr. Mandeep Baisla, Advocate and Mr.Ritik Dwivedi, Advocate, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Suhail Sehgal, Advocate & Mr. Chandan, Advocate, Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Ms.Nippun Sharma, Advocate and Mr. K.C.Mittal, Advocate, Mr. Vaibhav Yadav, Advocate & Mr. Sagar Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Bijender Singh, Advocate Mr. Karan Saini, Advocate, for the Respondent.

Employees are entitled to wage arrears from 01.01.1997 despite a Presidential Directive limiting payments, as the directive was deemed unjustified by the Tribunal.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Challenge to Arbitral Awards - Petitioner contested two Arbitral Awards directing payment of wage arrears to employees from 01.01.1997 - Tribunal held that the Presidential Directive restricting wage payments was unjustified and employees entitled to arrears - Petitioner’s arguments on statutory compliance and financial incapacity rejected. (Paras 1-60)

(B) Wage Revision - Entitlement - Employees of Indian Airlines entitled to wage revision from 01.01.1997 despite Presidential Directive stating otherwise - Tribunal found no justification for differential treatment compared to Air India employees. (Paras 22-60)

Facts of the case:
The dispute arose over wage arrears for employees of Indian Airlines, with claims dating back to 01.01.1997, amidst various Presidential Directives and negotiations. The Tribunal concluded that the employees were entitled to these arrears despite the Petitioner’s claims of statutory limitations. (Paras 1-60)

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal ruled that the employees were entitled to wage arrears from 01.01.1997, rejecting the Petitioner’s claims of financial incapacity and statutory compliance with the Presidential Directive. (Paras 1-60)

Issues: The main issues were the entitlement of employees to wage arrears from 01.01.1997 and the validity of the Presidential Directive limiting such payments. (Paras 1-60)

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal determined that wage revisions were due from 01.01.1997 and that the Presidential Directive was not a valid barrier to payment, emphasizing the need for equitable treatment across employees. (Paras 1-60)

Result: Petitions dismissed; Arbitral Awards upheld. (Paras 1-60)

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. - The present decision disposes of two petitions that have been filed by Air India Ltd. under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act'). These petitions challenge two distinct Arbitral Awards dated 25.05.2016, granted in favor of the first respondents in OMP (COMM) 33/2016 and OMP (COMM) 33/2016, i.e., All India Aircraft Engineers' Association and Indian Aircraft Technicians Association, respectively, regarding their claims. The impugned awards issued the following directions to the Petitioner:

"OMP (COMM) 33/2016: Award in favour of Claimant/Respondent No.1

"49. In view of the foregoing discussions, award is passed allowing the claims of the claimants with directions to the respondents to pay to them

a) Rs.57,92,47,222/- being the principal amount within three months;

b) Simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum upon Rs.57,92,47,222/- from 1.9.2006 till the date of the Award within three months from the date of the award.

c) Interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of award till payment upon the principal sum and interest accrued thereon till the date of the award in case, of failure of the respondents to make the above payments at (a) and (b), within three months from the date of the award.

d) Costs of the arbitration proceedings to the tune of Rs 14,53,250/- payable within three months."

OMP (COMM) 34/2016:Award in favour of Claimant/Respondent No.1

"55. In view of the foregoing discussions, award is passed directing

a) Payment by the respondents to Arup Kumar Bagchi a sum of Rs.7,81,768/- together with simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum from 1.8.2006 till the award within three months and interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of award till payment not only upon the said sum but interest accrued thereon as well till the award in case, of failure of the respondents to make payments, as aforesaid, within the time granted for the same.

b) Air India to calculate wage arrears payable to other members of the Claimant-Union for the period 1.1.1997 to 31.7.2006 within three months.

c) the respondents to pay:

(i) sums found due on calculation within three months thereafter

(ii) Simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the sums found due on calculation from 1.8.2006 till the date of the award within the time provided in (i) above

(iii) Interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the award till payment not only upon the sums found due on calculation but on interest accrued thereon as well till the award in case of failure of the respondents to make the payments at (i) and (ii) within the time granted thereunder

(iv) Costs of arbitration proceeding to the tune of Rs. 46,61,250/- within three months"

2. The assailed Awards relate to a long-standing dispute that arose almost 15 years ago between the Petitioner's predecessor-in-interest, Indian Airlines Limited, and its employees. The 2nd Respondent named in both petitions is a proforma party, and is the Union of India through the Ministry of Civil Aviation. The contesting respondents are two trade unions registered in accordance with the Trade Union Act of 1926. The first respondent named in OMP(COMM) 33/2016 is the All India Aircraft Engineers Association, a trade union consisting of aircraft engineers employed by the Petitioner and its predecessor-in-interest. The Association is organized into five regional chapters located in Delhi, Mumbai, Calcutta, Chennai, and Hyderabad and asserts that it represents the interests of 480 members who served as engineers either under the Petitioner or its predecessor-in-interest. The first respondent named in OMP(COMM) 34/2016 is the Indian Aircraft Technicians Association tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top