IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jasmeet Singh, J.
Jagat Narayan - Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation - Respondent
Cr.REV.P. 212 of 2023
Decided On : 27-09-2023
Murder - Criminal Procedure Code - [302/323/325/201/218/149/34/120B IPC] - The court discussed the sufficiency of the injury inflicted upon the deceased to cause death, the medical opinion, and the duty of the accused. The court found that the ingredients of section 300 IPC prima facie seem to be satisfied and upheld the order on charge dated 09.01.2023 and formal order on charge dated 13.01.2023.
Fact of the Case:
The petition sought to set aside the order on charge dated 09.01.2023 and formal order on charge dated 13.01.2023 in a murder case. The deceased was allegedly abused and beaten by the accused police officers, resulting in his death.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the ingredients of section 300 IPC prima facie seem to be satisfied and upheld the order on charge dated 09.01.2023 and formal order on charge dated 13.01.2023.
Issues: The sufficiency of the injury inflicted upon the deceased to cause death, the medical opinion, and the duty of the accused.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the ingredients of section 300 IPC prima facie seem to be satisfied and upheld the order on charge dated 09.01.2023 and formal order on charge dated 13.01.2023.
Final Decision: The petition seeking to set aside the order on charge dated 09.01.2023 and formal order on charge dated 13.01.2023 was dismissed.
JUDGMENT
1. This is a petition seeking setting aside of the order on charge dated 09.01.2023 and formal order on charge dated 13.01.2023 in Case No. 20/2022, CC No. 28/2022, RC No. 12(s)/2021/(0532021S0012), at P.S. CBI/SCB/Lucknow in FIR No. 391/2021, whereby charges u/s 302/323/325/201/218/149/34/120B IPC have been framed against the Revisionist.
2. The brief facts of the case are:
i. FIR No. 391/2021 dated 29.09.2021 was registered against SHO Jagat Narayan Singh (Revisionist herein), SI Akshaya Mishra, SI Vijay Mishra and three other police officials on the complaint of Smt. Meenakshi Gupta (wife of deceased Manish Gupta).
ii. On 27.09.2021, the deceased Manish Gupta, along with two other people checked-in room no. 512 of Hotel Krishna Palace, Gorakhpur. In the intervening night of 27/28/09.2021 at about 12:00 am, the Revisionist, along with other accused police officers, including SI Akshay Kumar Mishra, Constable Prashant Kumar, and Head Constable Kamlesh Singh Yadav, arrived at the Hotel. Upon inquiring with the Hotel Manager (Aadarsh Pandey), the accused persons were informed that room No. 512 was occupied by three individuals from different districts of UP and Haryana. This prompted them to check the room. They knocked on the door, which was then opened by Harbir. Upon entering the room, the Revisionist requested Harbir to provide his identity card and explain the purpose of his visit to Gorakhpur. Harbir presented his own ID and the ID of Pradeep Kumar, who was asleep at the time, and requested that the deceased, Manish Gupta, also shows his ID to them.
iii. It is alleged that the Revisionist asked the occupants of the said room to go with them to the police station for further inquiry. In between, the deceased Manish Gupta called his friend Durgesh Vajpai for help.
iv. It is further alleged that Harbir and Manish were abused and beaten by the accused persons i.e, the Revisionist, SI Akshay Kumar Mishra and Constable Prashant Kumar. When the deceased Manish Gupta protested from being taken out of the room, the Revisionist allegedly pushed the forehead of the deceased against a wall, as a result of which he lost consciousness and fell on the floor- face first. Efforts were made to bring the deceased back to consciousness, but he did not move.
v. Subsequently, with the help of the Hotel staff, the deceased was brought from his room to the ground floor and the Revisionist, along with other police officials took him to the hospital wherein he was declared dead.
vi. After initial investigation of this case by SIT, Gorakhpur, the investigation was transferred to SIT Kanpur on 02.11.2021. The government of U.P. issued a notification on 22.10.2021 for transferring the investigation to CBI. Accordingly, on 02.11.2021, the CBI registered the present RC and filed chargesheet against the Revisionist for the offences u/s 302/323/325/201/218/149/34/120B IPC.
vii. Vide order dated 09.01.2021, the learned Trial Court was pleased to order for framing of charges u/s 302/323/325/506/218/201 r/w 34/120-B/149 of IPC against the Revisionist Jagat Narayan Singh and vide order dated 13.01.2023, charges were framed against the Revisionist including section 302 IPC.
SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE REVISIONIST
3. Mr. Mohan, learned counsel for the Revisionist submits that it is an admitted case of the prosecution that Sh. Vipin Tanda, the then S.S.P Gorakhpur directed the Revisionist and other police officers of the district to visit and check hotels to prevent any illegal activity in view of prevailing law and order situation. Hotel Krishna Palace was falling within the jurisdiction of P.S Ramgarh Tal where the Revisionist was posted as the SHO.
4. Thereafter, the Revisionist directed his subordinate staff to accompany him to various hotels including Hotel Krishna Palace. He further submits that it is also an admitted case of the prosecution that when Mr. Aadarsh Pandey (receptionist of Hotel Krishna Palace) was asked to show the IDs of all the occupants of
Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab
Litta Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Shaikh Matin v. State of Maharashtra
Ghulam Hassan Beigh v. Mohd. Maqbool Magrey
AI
At the stage of framing of the charge, the accused has no right to produce any material, and the trial court has to apply its judicial mind to the facts of the case to determine whether a case has be....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the charges should be framed based on the evidence collected by the investigating officer, and the court has the authority to direct the trial....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of legal provisions and case laws to determine the nature of the offence and the intention of the accused.
The court determined that at the discharge stage, only a prima facie case is considered, and sufficient evidence of grievous injury justified framing charges under attempted murder.
At charge framing stage, prima facie case or grave suspicion suffices; no threadbare evidence analysis. Postmortem linking leg injury to kidney degeneration via vascular failure establishes nexus for....
Intent and knowledge regarding the commission of offences under Section 307 IPC can be inferred from actions and circumstances, regardless of the nature or extent of actual injuries inflicted.
The court established that for a charge under Section 307 IPC to be sustained, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not present in this case due to the nature of injuries and the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.