Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Parminder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Hotel Corporation of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition requests for pay scale revision. (Para 1) |
| 2. history of pay-scale revisions and guidelines. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. context and background of employment and pay structure. (Para 3) |
| 4. petitioners argue for pay revisions based on guidelines. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. discussion on the legal grounds for writ of mandamus. (Para 29 , 32 , 41) |
| 6. respondents claim no vested right for pay revision. (Para 30 , 31 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. court's analysis on pay revision claims. (Para 39 , 42 , 47 , 49) |
| 8. no legal right to claim parity in pay revisions. (Para 56 , 61 , 68 , 79) |
| 9. financial condition affects pay revision capability. (Para 70 , 80) |
| 10. court's reasoning on financial constraints affecting pay revision. (Para 81 , 84) |
| 11. judgment dismisses petition for lack of entitlement. (Para 91 , 92 , 93) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. - The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking following reliefs:
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for implementation of 2008 Guidelines issued by Respondent No.4 for the r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
