JUDGMENT

Girish Kathpalia, J.

1. By way of these petitions, brought under proviso to Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the petitioner/landlord has challenged dismissal after full dress trials of the two eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act pertaining to two different portions (hereinafter referred to as "the subject premises") on ground floor of the larger premises bearing No. 1779, Kucha Latto Shah, Dariba Kalan, Delhi. The factual and legal matrix being similar, these petitions are taken up together for disposal through this common judgment. On notice, the respondents/tenants entered appearance through counsel. I heard learned counsel for both sides and examined the trial court record.

2. Briefly stated, circumstances leading to the present petitions are as follows.

2.1. The petitioner, claiming herself to be the owner of ground floor (of which subject premises are part) and first floor of the said larger premises No. 1779, Kucha Latto Shah, Dariba Kalan, Delhi, by virtue of registered Sale Deed dated 06.06.1989, filed two eviction petitions, pleading that Shri Goverdhan Dass Daga, father of the respondents was induct