SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 239

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Sh Ashok Kumar Bhola - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi. & Ors. - Respondents
TR.P.(C.) 28 of 2024
Decided On : 16-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tarun Kumar Tiwari, Advocate with Mr. S.P. Gupta, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Udit Malik, ASC with Mr. Vishal Chanda, Advocates for R-1 Vinod Kumar Bhola (R-3) in person.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court has the authority to transfer a probate case from one court to another upon the request of the petitioner and with the consent of the respondents.

Headnote:

Transfer - Probate Case - The court ordered the transfer of Probate Case 36/2023 from the court of the learned Additional District Judge, South-East, District Saket, to the competent court in the South District, Saket.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought transfer of Probate Case 36/2023 from one court to another due to it being inadvertently filed before the wrong court.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted the transfer as requested by the petitioner and the respondents had no objection to the transfer.

Issues: Transfer of Probate Case from one court to another.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the consent of the respondents and the petitioner's request for transfer due to inadvertent filing.

Final Decision: Probate Case 36/2023 (Ashok Kumar Bhola v. State of NCT of Delhi) stands transferred from the court of learned ADJ, South-East, District Saket to the competent court in the South District, Saket.

ORDER (Oral)

1. By this petition, the petitioner in Probate Case 36/2023 (Ashok Kumar Bhola v. State of NCT of Delhi) seeks transfer of the Probate Case from the court of the learned Additional District Judge, South- East, District Saket, to the competent court in the South District, Saket.

2. It is submitted by Mr. Tarun Kumar Tiwari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, that the probate case was inadvertently filed before the learned District Judge, South-East, District, Saket.

3. Mr. Vinod Kumar Bhola, who appears in person, represents Respondents 2 and 3. Respondent 1 is State of NCT of Delhi, which is represented by Mr. Udit Malik, learned ASC. Learned Counsel for the respondents have no objection to the probate case being transferred as sought in this petition.

4. Accordingly, Probate Case 36/2023 (Ashok Kumar Bhola v. State of NCT of Delhi) stands transferred from the court of learned ADJ, South-East, District Saket to the competent court in the South District, Saket.

5. The Registry of the Saket Court is directed to forthwith transmit the papers of this case to the Court of learned District Judge, South District, Saket, who would assign it to the competent court.

6. The probate case would proceed from the stage at which it is at present.

7. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top