DELHI HIGH COURT
REVA KHETRAPAL
Jagdish Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Kumar Pal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Reva Khetrapal, J.
IA No.5347/2012 (under Order VI Rule XVII CPC filed by the plaintiff)
1. By this common order, it is proposed to decide the application filed by the plaintiff under order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint being IA No.5347/2012, and two applications filed by the defendants No.1 and 2, one under Order XXXIX Rule 4 for vacation of the interim order dated August 12, 2011 passed by this Court restraining the defendants from transferring, alienating or parting with possession of the suit properties being IA No.18753/2011 and the other under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint being IA No.17345/2011.
2. The facts leading to the filing of the aforesaid applications as set out in the suit for declaration, injunction and rendition of accounts filed by the plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish Bansal through his attorney, Mr. Anil Goyal may be briefly delineated as follows.
3. The plaintiff alleges that he is a senior citizen, residing in New York since the last several decades, and is a practicing Doctor who has amassed a huge amount of money from his medical practice. He came in contact with the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.