SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
REVA KHETRAPAL
Jagdish Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Kumar Pal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Reva Khetrapal, J.

IA No.5347/2012 (under Order VI Rule XVII CPC filed by the plaintiff)

1. By this common order, it is proposed to decide the application filed by the plaintiff under order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint being IA No.5347/2012, and two applications filed by the defendants No.1 and 2, one under Order XXXIX Rule 4 for vacation of the interim order dated August 12, 2011 passed by this Court restraining the defendants from transferring, alienating or parting with possession of the suit properties being IA No.18753/2011 and the other under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint being IA No.17345/2011.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the aforesaid applications as set out in the suit for declaration, injunction and rendition of accounts filed by the plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish Bansal through his attorney, Mr. Anil Goyal may be briefly delineated as follows.

3. The plaintiff alleges that he is a senior citizen, residing in New York since the last several decades, and is a practicing Doctor who has amassed a huge amount of money from his medical practice. He came in contact with the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top