SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
J.R.MIDHA
Mukesh Rani – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellants have challenged the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal whereby their application for compensation has been dismissed.

2. On 25th July, 2008, Jagbir Singh was waiting for a train on the platform of Mangolpuri Railway Station when he accidently fell down on the railway track due to the over-crowd and was ran over by Awadh Assam Express Train. The deceased was survived by widow and two minor children who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.

3. The Railway Claims Tribunal held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger holding a valid ticket at the time of accident. However, learned Claims Tribunal rejected the claim on the ground that Section 123(c) of the Railways Act only covers the cases of the passengers who accidently fall down from the train. Learned Tribunal held that since the deceased has not fallen down from the train, the claim does not come within the definition of an untoward incident as defined in Section 123(c) of the Railways Act.

4. Section 124A of the Railways Act lays down strict liability or no fault liability in case of untoward incidents. Section 123(c) of the Railways Act defines `untoward incident' to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top