IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Shivashish Shubham, Ex CPL 916092-B - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 33 of 2021 & CM Appl. 98 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 43 of 2021 & CM Appl. 123 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 49 of 2021 & CM Appl. 195 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. similar claims for pro rata pension (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. agreement on petition disposal (Para 4) |
| 3. direction for verifying claims (Para 5) |
| 4. conditions for pension payment (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s states that all the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s in all these petitions, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petitions.
4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petitions be disposed of.
5. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.
6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
The court affirmed the right to equal treatment under Article 14 for pension entitlements, directing payment of arrears if petitioners are similarly situated to prior beneficiaries.
Similar claimants must be granted equal pension rights based on verified eligibility against established legal precedents.
The court established the principle that similarly placed individuals must be granted equal pension benefits, ensuring fairness and due process in administrative decisions.
The court emphasized the principle of equal treatment for similarly situated individuals regarding pension entitlements, mandating verification by the Indian Air Force based on established precedents....
Individuals similarly situated in prior judgments must receive equitable relief, including pro rata pension, contingent on verification by the Indian Air Force.
Entitlement to pro rata pension established, conditional on verification of similarity to other petitioners' cases.
The court established that procedural verification is necessary for pension claims, ensuring fairness and timely payments to eligible individuals.
Entitlement to pro rata pension hinges on verification of petitioner's status against established criteria, preserving rights to appeal and ensuring timely payment with interest.
The court held that petitioners in similar circumstances are entitled to equal treatment in terms of pension, with the requirement for timely verification and communication of rights.
The court affirmed the right to equal treatment in pension claims, requiring verification of eligibility related to prior judgments while ensuring the petitioner can appeal if denied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.