SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Shivashish Shubham, Ex CPL 916092-B - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 33 of 2021 & CM Appl. 98 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 43 of 2021 & CM Appl. 123 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 49 of 2021 & CM Appl. 195 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2021




The court affirmed the right to equal treatment under Article 14 for pension entitlements, directing payment of arrears if petitioners are similarly situated to prior beneficiaries.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - Pro rata pension - Petitioners seek relief for grant of pro rata pension similar to previous decisions - Petitions heard via video conferencing and requisite No Objection Certificates filed - Respondents directed to verify and grant relief if petitioners are similarly placed - Interest on delayed payment of pension specified. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Rule of Law - The principle of equality under Article 14 mandates that similarly situated individuals be treated alike in matters of benefits and entitlements - The right to appeal is preserved for respondents against earlier judgments. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners are former members of the Indian Air Force seeking pro rata pension benefits similar to those granted in previous connected rulings. They have filed the required No Objection Certificates with their petitions.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the Indian Air Force to determine the eligibility of the petitioners for pro rata pension and to make payments accordingly, with interest if delays occur.

Issues: The principal issues centered on the petitioners' entitlement to pro rata pension and the timeline for disbursement of these payments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that all individuals in similar circumstances deserve equivalent treatment concerning entitlements, adhering to the equal protection principles established in preceding judgments. Preserving the right to appeal ensures procedural fairness.

Result: Petitions disposed of with directions for entitlement verification and payment.

Table of Content
1. similar claims for pro rata pension (Para 2 , 3)
2. agreement on petition disposal (Para 4)
3. direction for verifying claims (Para 5)
4. conditions for pension payment (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s states that all the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s in all these petitions, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petitions.

4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petitions be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top