Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for pro rata pension (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. conditions for granting pro rata pension (Para 4) |
| 3. interest on unpaid arrears (Para 5) |
| 4. order issuance and notification (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that all the petitioners in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioner in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been given.
4. Accordingly, the petition and application are disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and othe
Individuals similarly situated in prior judgments must receive equitable relief, including pro rata pension, contingent on verification by the Indian Air Force.
Entitlement to pro rata pension established, conditional on verification of similarity to other petitioners' cases.
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for similarly situated individuals, mandating verification and timely payment of arrears.
Similar claimants must be granted equal pension rights based on verified eligibility against established legal precedents.
The court established the principle that similarly placed individuals must be granted equal pension benefits, ensuring fairness and due process in administrative decisions.
Court mandated equal treatment for similarly situated individuals regarding pension entitlements, affirming verification rights and specifying interest on delayed payments.
The court affirmed the right to equal treatment under Article 14 for pension entitlements, directing payment of arrears if petitioners are similarly situated to prior beneficiaries.
The court established that procedural verification is necessary for pension claims, ensuring fairness and timely payments to eligible individuals.
Entitlement to pro rata pension hinges on verification of petitioner's status against established criteria, preserving rights to appeal and ensuring timely payment with interest.
The court emphasized the principle of equal treatment for similarly situated individuals regarding pension entitlements, mandating verification by the Indian Air Force based on established precedents....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
