SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Lalit Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 89 of 2021 & CM Appl. 274 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 114 of 2021 & CM Appl. 342 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2021




Court mandated equal treatment for similarly situated individuals regarding pension entitlements, affirming verification rights and specifying interest on delayed payments.

Headnote:(A) Union of India - Grant of Pro Rata Pension - The petitioners claim entitlement to pro rata pension similar to previous related cases - Respondents directed to verify and grant emoluments within twelve weeks or communicate reasons for any denial - Interest on delayed payment specified at 7% per annum. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Right to Remedy - It affirms that if any petitions are found undeserving of relief, the respondents must provide written reasons for the same. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners are seeking pro rata pension, claiming equality with beneficiaries in identified precedents, and have submitted requisite NOCs along with petitions.

Findings of Court:
The court directed that the IAF must determine the eligibility of petitioners for pension similar to stated cases, with provisions for remedies in case of denial.

Issues: The key issue addressed was the entitlement of petitioners to pro rata pension akin to earlier judgments and the respondents' verification process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court recognized the need for consistent treatment of similarly situated individuals, mandating a verification process and specifying consequences for delayed payments.

Result: Petitions disposed of with directives to the respondents.

Table of Content
1. claims for pro rata pension similarities (Para 2 , 3)
2. respondent's agreement on petition disposition (Para 4)
3. instructions for pension payment verification (Para 5)
4. interest on unpaid pension arrears (Para 6)
5. order dissemination requirements (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s states that all the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s in all these petitions, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petitions.

4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right to appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petitions be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of, directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said 12 weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top