SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Nirmal – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dispute settled; fir quashing requested. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. no useful purpose in prosecution. (Para 11)
3. fir quashed based on lack of purpose. (Para 12)
4. petition allowed and disposed. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

CRL. M.A. 8888/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL. M.A. 8889/2021 (exemption)

3. Application is allowed with direction to file attested affidavit within four weeks of courts resuming normal functioning.

4. Application is disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 1092/2021

5. Vide the present writ petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.510/2019, registered at PS - Sector 23, Dwarka, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

6. Notice issued.

7. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 who appeared in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

8. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 have no objection if the present petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top