IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Nirmal - Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - Respondent
W.P. (Crl.) 1092 of 2021
Decided On : 04-06-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute settled; fir quashing requested. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. no useful purpose in prosecution. (Para 11) |
| 3. fir quashed based on lack of purpose. (Para 12) |
| 4. petition allowed and disposed. (Para 13) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
CRL. M.A. 8888/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL. M.A. 8889/2021 (exemption)
3. Application is allowed with direction to file attested affidavit within four weeks of courts resuming normal functioning.
4. Application is disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 1092/2021
5. Vide the present writ petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.510/2019, registered at PS - Sector 23, Dwarka, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
6. Notice issued.
7. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 who appeared in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
8. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.
9. Respondent no.2 is personally present in Court through video conferencing and she has been identified by learned counsel for respondent No.2 and she submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
10. Petitioners and respondent no.2 has entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 13.04.2021.
11. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.
12. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.510/2019, registered at PS - Sector 23, Dwarka, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
13. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
The court can quash an FIR if parties reach an amicable settlement and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and do not wish to pursue prosecution, ensuring judicial efficiency.
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainants express a desire not to proceed with prosecution.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
The court validated the quashing of an FIR based on the parties' amicable settlement, indicating that prosecution lacks utility when disputes are resolved.
The court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and do not wish to prosecute further, as continued prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties provide a valid basis for quashing FIRs when further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can lead to the quashing of FIRs when further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Quashing of FIR is permissible when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to proceed with prosecution.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of FIRs when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.