Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Nasir Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. proceedings initiated for fir. (Para 1 , 4 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. resolution of marital dispute. (Para 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 3. exceptions for quashing fir. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's decision to quash fir. (Para 15) |
| 5. final order and conclusion. (Para 16 , 17) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
Crl.M.A. 3849/2021 (for early hearing)
1. By this application, petitioners are seeking preponement of the date of hearing.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr.G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, accepts notice.
4. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and with the consent of counsel for the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing today itself.
5. The application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 404/2021
6. Petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No. 273/2018, under Sections 323/376/328/34 IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, registered at police station Farsh Bazar, Delhi.
7. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the marriage between petitioner and respondent No.2/complainant was solemnized in 2017 as per Muslim rites and due to some differences, the FIR in question w
The court established that marital reconciliation and mutual agreement can serve as grounds for quashing serious offences under IPC in particular circumstances, allowing the accused to avoid further ....
The reconciliation of the marriage, the birth of the child, and the complainant's desire to end the proceedings can be grounds for quashing the FIR and related proceedings.
Court may quash FIR for serious offenses if complainant reconciles with the accused and expresses no desire to proceed, thereby conserving judicial resources.
The court may consider quashing the FIR and proceedings if the complainant/prosecutrix desires to withdraw the complaint and if there are exceptional circumstances, such as marriage between the accus....
The court can quash FIRs in cases of alleged sexual offences if the complainant unequivocally expresses a desire to resolve disputes amicably after marriage, indicating no public interest in continui....
The court may quash an FIR when the parties reach an amicable settlement and the complainant does not object, indicating no useful purpose in prosecution.
The court can consider quashing FIR and related proceedings when the complainant/prosecutrix herself takes the initiative to resolve the misunderstanding and does not wish to pursue the proceedings, ....
Consent under false promise of marriage does not constitute an offense unless it can be established that the promise was false from the beginning.
The court may quash FIRs for non-compoundable offenses under specific circumstances where misunderstandings are resolved, particularly involving parties who have married post-complaint.
The court can quash an FIR under IPC sections concerning matrimonial disputes when parties reach an amicable settlement, rendering further prosecution purposeless.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
