Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
United Telecoms Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. leave granted for withdrawal of petition (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal of the petition as withdrawn (Para 2) |
(Video-Conferencing)
1. After some hearing, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to seek other appropriate remedies as may be available to his client in law. Leave and liberty is granted as prayed for.
2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
The right to withdraw a petition with leave to approach the arbitral tribunal is affirmed, emphasizing procedural flexibility in arbitration matters.
The court affirmed that parties can withdraw legal petitions upon reaching a settlement, reinforcing party autonomy in dispute resolution.
The court dismissed the writ petition at the petitioner's request, affirming the authority to withdraw the case.
The petitioner has the right to seek leave to withdraw the petition and reserve the liberty to raise the grounds urged in the petition before the trial Court.
Applicants before administrative tribunal may seek and obtain leave to withdraw original application at any stage prior to merits adjudication, resulting in dismissal as withdrawn without costs.
The petitioner retains the right to withdraw their petition and seek other legal remedies under the law.
Permission granted for withdrawal of a petition with liberty reserved for raising grounds before trial court.
A party may withdraw a petition at any stage, leading to its dismissal.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
