JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the present petition is directed only against the respondent no.1 and no relief has been claimed against the respondent nos. 5 and 6 in the present petition, the adjudication of the present petition need not await the service of notice of the petition on the respondent nos. 5 and 6 and they be treated as deleted from the array of the parties as far as the present petition is concerned. It is ordered accordingly.

2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 25.01.2019 passed by the learned National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the `learned Commission') in Consumer Complaint No.261/2018, Manish Kumar v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & 6 Ors., allowing the respondent no. 1, which is the Opposite Party no.1 in the Consumer Complaint, to file its written version to the Complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notice of the complaint was issued to the respondents, including the respondent no.1 on 07.02.2018. The respondent no. 1 was duly served with the notice on 12.04.2018. The statutory period for filing of the