SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Manish Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 567 of 2021
Decided On : 15-01-2021




The court upheld that petitioners similarly placed to prior judgments are entitled to pro rata pension benefits, mandating timely compliance by the respondents with specified conditions.

Headnote:(A) Union of India Act - Grant of pro rata pension to similarly placed petitioners as established in connected judgments.

(B) The court emphasized the importance of equitable relief and the right of the petitioners to receive the same benefits as awarded in precedent cases.

(C) The petitioners submitted requisite No Objection Certificates along with the petition.

Facts of the case:
Petitioners claim pro rata pension, similar to previously established cases, Brijlal Kumar and Govind Kumar Srivastava.

Findings of Court:
The respondents were directed to grant pension arrears within twelve weeks, with interest applicable if delayed.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to pro rata pension based on their similar circumstances as previous petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners must receive equitable treatment and similar relief as granted to those in identical situations, and it mandated a verification process for entitlement.

Result: Petition disposed with directions to grant relief.

Table of Content
1. petitioners are similarly placed for pro rata pension. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. respondents agree to verify claims. (Para 4)
3. directions for payment of pro rata pension. (Para 5)
4. interest on unpaid arrears of pension. (Para 6)
5. order to be communicated and uploaded. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM Appl. 1476/2021 (exemption)

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 567/2021

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that all the petitioners in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others, connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petition.

4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top