SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan – Appellant
Versus
Manju Sahgel – Respondent


Table of Content
1. employment history and retirement details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. contentions regarding cpf and gpf eligibility. (Para 5 , 7 , 9 , 10)
3. court's interpretation of prior cases. (Para 6 , 8 , 13)
4. limitations on matters post-retirement. (Para 11 , 12)
5. ruling favoring the petitioner. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. Both the present writ petitions raise similar questions of fact and law and are therefore being disposed of together by this common judgment. The petitions assail orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi.

2. Writ Petition (Civil) 7712/2020 impugns the order dated 26th September, 2019 in OA No. 2743/2018; and Writ Petition (Civil) 9851/2020 impugns the order dated 28th February 2020 in OA No. 1398/2019. Vide both the impugned orders, the CAT allowed the OA filed by the respondents herein and have directed that the benefit of the GPF cum pension scheme be extended to them. Respondents were directed to refund the employers' contribution along with interest and any other funds received by them under Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) scheme, which are to be refunded as per the scheme of the respondent organizati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top