IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Navneet Rana - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 945 of 2021 & Crl.M.A. 4776 of 2021 and Crl.M.C. 949 of 2021 & Crl.M.A. 4781 of 2021
Decided On : 22-03-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of firs sought (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties resolved dispute amicably (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's inclination to quash firs (Para 5 , 9) |
| 4. firs quashed based on resolution (Para 10) |
| 5. petitions allowed and disposed (Para 11 , 12) |
1. Vide above captioned first petition, quashing of quashing of FIR No. 102/2021, registered at Samaipur Badli, Delhi is sought.
2. In the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No. 92/2021, registered at police station Samaipur Badli, Delhi is sought by petitioners.
3. Notice issued.
4. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice in both the petitions and submits that parties to the present FIRs are minor and they are represented through their parents/legal guardians and they are present in the Court.
5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.
6. On 19.02.2021, a scuffle between students of class XI and XII took place in the premises of Mount Abu School, Rohini, which culminated into registration of the afore-noted cross FIRs against the parties.
7. Counsel for the parties submit that with the intervention of parents, elders in the family and common friends the dispute inter se parties has been amicably resolved and in this regard, a written request has been made before the SHO concerned.
8. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, on instructions from Investigating Officers of these FIRs, affirm the factum of settlement between the parties.
9. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIRs in question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the proceedings arising therefrom.
10. For the reasons afore-noted, FIR No. 102/2021 & FIR No. 92/2021, both registered at police station Samaipur Badli, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
11. The petitions are accordingly allowed and disposed of.
12. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
FIRs can be quashed when disputes between minor parties are amicably resolved, emphasizing settlement over judicial proceedings.
A quashing of FIR is permissible when parties have amicably resolved their dispute, promoting justice and restoring harmony.
FIR quashed - Amicable settlement between parties - Petition has been filed on ground that matter has been amicably resolved between parties and complainant does not wish to pursue case against petit....
Court emphasizes the significance of amicable resolution among minors when quashing criminal charges to safeguard their future prospects.
The court has the authority to quash FIRs when parties reach an amicable resolution, prioritizing justice and preventing unnecessary legal proceedings.
Quashing of FIR is appropriate when disputes between the parties are resolved amicably, and continuation of proceedings serves no useful purpose.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to quash an FIR based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the promotion of cordiality and harmony in the sa....
Amicable resolution of a dispute between parties, affirmed by the complainant, can lead to the quashing of an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have resolved their disputes amicably, negating any purpose for prosecution.
Amicable settlement and private nature of the dispute as grounds for quashing FIRs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.