Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
GTL Infrastructure Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment of arbitrator for disputes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no objection to arbitration. (Para 3) |
| 3. details and responsibilities of the arbitrator. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. no opinion on petition's contentions. (Para 8 , 9) |
1. This petition is one of a batch of four petitions, which were listed before this Court on 3rd March, 2021, the other three being ARB. P. 511/2020, ARB. P. 513/2020 and ARB. P. 540/2020.
2. This Court had appointed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, an eminent retired Judge of the Supreme Court of India who had also adorned the Bench of this Court, as the arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes forming subject matter of ARB. P. 511/2020, ARB. P. 513/2020 and ARB. P. 540/2020.
3. Today, Mr. Sameer Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for respondent-BSNL, submits that he has no objection to the present dispute also being referred to arbitration.
4. In view thereof, the dispute forming subject matter of this petition is also referred to arbitration by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur. The contact details of the learned arbitrator are provided as under:
A-26, First Floor, Gulmohar Park,
New Delhi-110049.
Phone Nos.: 011-42484424
98
The court ordered reference to arbitration between the parties due to mutual consent, affirming the arbitrator's authority to resolve all issues related to the dispute.
Parties may appoint an arbitrator by mutual agreement, leading to dispute resolution under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need for adherence to due process.
The court appointed a retired judge to arbitrate disputes between parties, allowing all issues to remain open for decision under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The arbitration process is governed by mutual consent, allowing parties to appoint an arbitrator and seek interim relief under Sections 12(2) and 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Appointment of an arbitrator in instances where the respondent does not object to arbitration is valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the importance of efficient dispute reso....
The court appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes as per the arbitration clause in the agreement, emphasizing that the parties are bound to arbitrate their disagreements.
The court appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes between parties, emphasizing adherence to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act procedures.
The court affirms the validity of the arbitration agreement and appoints an arbitrator as the parties consented to resolve disputes via arbitration.
The court appointed an arbitrator for disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, affirming the parties' agreement on arbitration without addressing the merits of the controversy.
The court affirmed that parties can mutually consent to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, with obligations on the arbitrator to ensure expeditious resolution of disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
