Jai Durga Enterprises vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Jai Durga Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. contract performance guarantee requirements (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
2. disputes over compliance with performance guarantee (Para 5 , 6)
3. calculation of time periods in contractual agreements (Para 13 , 14)
4. interpretation of time-related statutes (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. performance guarantee submission considered timely (Para 23)
6. termination of the contract deemed erroneous (Para 24)
7. writ petition allowed; termination set aside (Para 25 , 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for respondent submits that reply to CM Application No.13915/2021 has been filed vide diary No. E-380690/2021 on 22.05.2021. However, the same is not on record, but a copy has been furnished on the e-mail of the Court Master. The same is taken on record. The Registry is also directed to place the reply on record.

3. Learned counsel submits that the reply along with its documents be read in addition to the short reply to the writ petition filed by the respondents.

4. Petitioner impugns termination letter dated 18.08.2020, whereby the contract awarded to the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSANJEEV SACHDEVAJai Durga Enterprises – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Jai Durga Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent