SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Urban Improvement Co. Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 6131 of 2021 & CM Appl. 19413 of 2021
Decided On : 06-08-2021




Violation of natural justice in administrative proceedings necessitates judicial intervention, and the availability of appeals does not negate this requirement.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 156, and 270A - Writ petition challenging assessment order and notice of demand on grounds of violation of natural justice due to lockdown impeding response - Court held that the absence of opportunity to respond justified the challenge - Appeal mechanism does not bar writ maintenance in cases of natural justice violations. (Paras 2-7)

(B) Principles of Natural Justice - The court ruled that a violation of natural justice mandates intervention, emphasizing the necessity for an effective opportunity to respond in administrative proceedings. (Paras 3-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, limited company, contended its inability to respond to a Draft Assessment Order and a Show Cause Notice due to lockdown constraints and the illness of its Chartered Accountant caused by Covid-19, asserting that these circumstances operated to its prejudice.

Findings of Court:
The Court acknowledged the petitioner's lack of opportunity due to lockdown and illness, asserting that this justified the petitioner's claims. The impugned assessment and notices were set aside and remanded for further proceedings.

Issues: The court addressed whether the petitioner had an effective opportunity to present its case and the implications of violations of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that violations of principles of natural justice could warrant judicial intervention, stating that appeals do not suffice as a remedy where such violations occur.

Result: Petition allowed and matter remanded for reevaluation.

Table of Content
1. violation of natural justice principles. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. alternative remedy available. (Para 5)
3. court acknowledges lack of effective response opportunity. (Para 6)
4. settled law on natural justice violations. (Para 7)
5. petition disposed and order communicated. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Impugned Assessment Order u/s 143(3), the Impugned Notice of Demand issued u/s 156 of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 [the Act], both dated 23rd April, 2021 and the Show Cause Notice for Penalty dated 09th June, 2021 under Section 270A of the Act issued by the Respondent in the Petitioner's case for the Assessment Year 2018-19.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that there has been a violation of principles of natural justice as the Petitioner due to covid-19 pandemic was prevented from furnishing a response to the Show Cause Notice and file objections to the Draft Assessment Order, for reasons beyond its control and as such, the impugned order operates to the prejudice of the Petitioner.

4. He states that though the Show Cause Notice/Draft Assessment Order was issued on 19th April 2021 requiring the Petitioner to explain by 22nd April 2021 as to why the assessment should not be completed as per the Draft Assessment Order, yet the petitioner could not file a response as the petitioner's office was closed due to a lockdown w.e.f. 19th April, 2021, in Delhi and as the petitioner's Chartered Accountant was suffering from Covid from 10th April, 2021. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn this Court's attention to the affidavit of the Chartered Accountant, Shri Uma Shanker Gupta, as well as his medical record and the affidavit of the Shri Bharat Bhushan, Chairman and Whole Time Director, nominated by the Government of India for the petitioner company.

5. Mr.Puneet Rai, leaned counsel for the respondent states that the petitioner has an alternative effective remedy by way of an appeal.

6. Having perused the paper book, this Court is of the view that as the petitioner's office was closed due to lockdown and as the petitioner's Chartered Accountant was suffering from Covid-19, the petitioner did not get an effective opportunity to respond to the Draft Assessment Order and show-cause notice dated 19th April, 2021.

7. It is a settled law that when there is a violation of principles of natural justice, the availability of an appellate remedy does not operate as a bar to the maintainability of the writ petition. Consequently the Impugned Assessment, Notice of Demand both dated 23rd April, 2021 and the Show Cause Notice for Penalty dated 09th June, 2021 for the assessment year 2018-19 are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Respondent for taking necessary steps in accordance with law. Registry is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the Respondent for information and necessary action.

8. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition along with pending application stands disposed of.

9. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top