IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Ramprastha Buildwell Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8280 of 2021 & CM Appls. 25689-90 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 8282 of 2021 & CM Appls. 25693-94 of 2021
Decided On : 12-08-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to assessment orders under tax law. (Para 2) |
| 2. violation of natural justice due to lockdown. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. failure to provide meaningful opportunity to respond. (Para 7) |
| 4. assessment orders set aside and remand. (Para 8) |
| 5. disposal of writ petition and order communication. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ petitions have been filed challenging the Assessment Orders dated 26th stndrdth April 2021 and 27th April 2021 in W.P. (C) 8282/2021 and W.P. (C) 8280/2021 respectively, passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2018-19. Petitioners also seek direction to Respondent No. 1 to grant an opportunity to the petitioners for filing objections against the show cause notices dated 21 April, 2021 and 22 April, 2021 in W.P. (C) 8282/2021 and W.P.(C) 8280/2021 respectively.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners contends that the impugned Assessment orders have been passed without granting an opportunity of filing objections against the notices cum draft assessment orders as the state of Delhi was under lockdown due to the second wave of Covid-19 Pandemic between date of notices and the date by which replies had to be filed i.e. 23 April, 2021 and 26 April, 2021 in WP(C) 8282/2021 and WP(C) 8280/2021 respectively.
4. He emphasises that the office premises of the Petitioners were closed between the date of issuance of notices and passing of the impugned orders due to curfew imposed between 19th April, 2021 and 3rd May, 2021 in pursuance to the Delhi Disaster Management Authorities orders and the Petitioners were unable to access their official emails and communicate the notices to their authorised representatives for filing objections/replies against the show cause notices-cum-draft assessment orders. Hence, according to him, there has been a gross violation of the principles of natural justice enshrined in Section 144B of the Act.
5. Issue Notice.
6. Mr. Sunil Agarwal, Advocate and Mr.Ruchir Bhatia Advocate accept notice on behalf of the respondents in WP(C) 8280/2021 and WP(C) 8282/2021 respectively. They state that it has been the consistent stand of NaFAC that in such cases where there has been a lapse of procedure on the part of Faceless Assessing officer due to technical reasons or otherwise, the Court may be requested to set aside the assessment orders and remand the matters back to the Assessing Officer for passing a fresh order after following the due procedure.
7. Having regard to the fact that the offices of the petitioners were closed due to lockdown and the petitioners' Account Officer was unavailable, this Court is of the view that the petitioners did not get an effective and meaningful opportunity to respond to the Draft Assessment Order and show-cause notices dated 21st April 2021 and 22nd April 2021.
8. Keeping in view the aforesaid as well as in accordance with the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the Impugned Assessment Orders dated 26th April 2021 and 27th April 2021 passed in W.P. (C) 8282/2021 and W.P. (C) 8280/2021 respectively, under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2018-19 are set aside and the matters are remanded back to the Respondent-Assessing Officers for taking appropriate steps in accordance with law.
9. Writ petition and applications stand disposed of in view of the above.
10. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
Assessment orders must respect natural justice, providing parties an effective opportunity to respond, especially during extraordinary situations like a pandemic.
The court ruled that a valid assessment order under the Income Tax Act requires adherence to statutory procedures, including compliance with natural justice, particularly when external circumstances ....
Violation of natural justice in administrative proceedings necessitates judicial intervention, and the availability of appeals does not negate this requirement.
Assessment orders violated principles of natural justice due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to be heard, warranting remand for fresh consideration.
The court affirmed that a violation of natural justice occurs if a party cannot respond due to circumstances beyond their control, allowing writ intervention despite alternative remedies.
Violation of principles of natural justice overrides the availability of an appellate remedy.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on the petitioner's ability to respond constituted a violation of the principle of natural justice. Ad....
An assessment order issued without observing procedural fairness and without providing adequate opportunity for compliance violates principles of natural justice.
The failure to grant a personal hearing during assessments constitutes a violation of natural justice, mandating the setting aside of the impugned orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.