SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Berry Developers and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National E Assessment Centre – Respondent


Table of Content
1. inadequate opportunity due to lockdown. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments on compliance with natural justice. (Para 4 , 6)
3. violation of statutory mandates and natural justice. (Para 7 , 8)
4. assessment order set aside and matter remanded. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 27th April, 2021 passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as `Act') on the ground that it had been passed without giving Petitioner/assessee a meaningful opportunity of being heard.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner, vide the draft assessment order-cum-show cause notice dated 20th April 2021, was asked to file its response by 23rd April 2021. She emphasises that a complete lock down was imposed in Delhi from 19th April, 2021 and the due date for completion of Assessment was initially extended to 30th June, 2021 and further to 30th September. 2021. She also points out that the petitioner on 25th April 2021 had sought an adjournment as it couldn't prepare the response due to closure of i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top