SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Rani Devi – Appellant
Versus
Indo Tibetan Border Police – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners’ entitlements regarding their deployment (Para 3 , 4)
2. counterarguments on necessity for transfer (Para 5 , 8)
3. court's view on administrative discretion (Para 6 , 7)
4. petition dismissed for lack of merit (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Amit Bansal, J.

CM No.24627/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 7926/2021

3. The two petitioners, being Constables (General Duty)(Female) working with respondent Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) have impugned the transfer order dated 20th July, 2021, whereby the respondent has posted the two petitioners to 8 Battalion and 47 Battalion respectively. The petitioners have further sought the following reliefs: (i) to redeploy the petitioners at the Indian Mission, Afghanistan in place of the officials who have served maximum period of service; (ii) not to remove the petitioners from the panel of personnel to be deployed at Afghanistan; (iii) to prepare a list of personnel including the petitioners who have served minimum period of service in Afghanistan in ascending order for the purposes of re-deployment, in pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top