Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Surinder Pal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges termination due to medical grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. due process and medical board requirements for termination. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. status quo maintained pending earlier order outcomes. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. suppression of facts leads to dismissal of petition. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed on grounds of suppression. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the award of sentence under Rule 29 of Sahastra Seema Bal, 2007 dated 13th April, 2021 issued by Dy. Inspector General of Sahastra Seema Bal. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents to stay the order of termination with immediate effect and to allow the Petitioner to continue with their employment till the outcome of the present writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner was appointed to the post of Constable (GD) on 31st December, 2014 in Sahastra Seema Bal. He states that the Petitioner could not complete his Basic Recruit Training Course (BRTC) within two years and two chances as mentioned in the offer letter, on account of his sufferin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
