Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JVL Electronics, Thanjavur – Appellant
Versus
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant appeals dismissal of application. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal of arbitration application (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. negotiations and offers made by parties (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. mediation and preservation of rights (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. court directs payment and mediation. (Para 10) |
| 6. conclusion and disposal of appeal (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
CM APPLN. 21047/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
FAO 144/2021 & CM APPLN. 21045-46/2021
1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Appellant impugns judgment dated 12.02.2021 whereby the application of the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been dismissed.
3. Appellant had sought stay of the termination letter dated 24.12.2020 and had sought permission to continue as the dealer of the respondent.
4. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that during the pendency of these proceedings, subsequent events have occurred whereby the respondent have taken back certain stocks and offered to pay a sum of Rs. 7,40,705.84 by their e-mail dated 17.05.2021 to the appellant in full and final settlement of all his claims. He submits that an
Court emphasizes the importance of preserving parties' rights while allowing for settlement negotiations under arbitration law.
The court considered the acceptance of payment without prejudice to further claims, and the referral to mediation as a means to resolve the disputes.
A settlement reached between parties renders an arbitral award satisfied, making any appeals regarding the matter infructuous.
The court recognized and gave effect to the full and final settlement between the parties, leading to the satisfaction of the arbitral award and disposal of the appeal.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of adjudicating certain matters through arbitration and the inapplicability of certain contentions for the arbitral proceedings.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, highlighting the importance of abiding by arbitral awards and the need for commercial parties to hon....
The court recognizes and upholds the mutual settlement reached between parties regarding the execution of an arbitral award, directing compliance within a specified timeframe.
Section 9 of the Arbitration Act only permits interim reliefs; final relief claims must be adjudicated by the Arbitral Tribunal.
The court upheld the validity of a Settlement Agreement that modified an arbitration award and waived claims for interest and costs.
The court clarified the impact of the interim award on the final adjudication, the requirement for the Petitioner to deposit the awarded amount, and the allowance for the Petitioner to file an applic....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
