IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
JVL Electronics, Thanjavur - Appellant
Versus
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
FAO 144 of 2021
Decided On : 19-07-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant appeals dismissal of application. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal of arbitration application (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. negotiations and offers made by parties (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. mediation and preservation of rights (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. court directs payment and mediation. (Para 10) |
| 6. conclusion and disposal of appeal (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
CM APPLN. 21047/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
FAO 144/2021 & CM APPLN. 21045-46/2021
1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Appellant impugns judgment dated 12.02.2021 whereby the application of the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been dismissed.
3. Appellant had sought stay of the termination letter dated 24.12.2020 and had sought permission to continue as the dealer of the respondent.
4. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that during the pendency of these proceedings, subsequent events have occurred whereby the respondent have taken back certain stocks and offered to pay a sum of Rs. 7,40,705.84 by their e-mail dated 17.05.2021 to the appellant in full and final settlement of all his claims. He submits that an application has been filed by the appellant seeking amendment of the prayer clause.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the said amount has been admitted by the respondent, respondent be directed to pay the same. He, however, submits that there are other claims of the appellant which would still survive as the said payment would not be as full and final settlement of all claims of the appellant.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that on further reconciliation of the accounts, a sum of Rs. 7,48,262.27 is being offered to the appellant. He submits that said payment is being offered without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and with a view to resolve the disputes. He further submits that in case appellant has any further claim, appellant may agitate the same before the appropriate forum.
7. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant would accept the said amount without prejudice to the rights and contentions and reserving the rights of the appellant to claim his further amount before the appropriate forum.
8. Further, learned counsel for the parties pray that parties may be given liberty of resolving their disputes through mediation and pray that parties be referred to mediation.
9. In view of the above statement, appeal is disposed of with a direction to respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 7,48,262.27 within a period of four weeks from today. It is clarified that this payment would be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and all rights of the appellant to claim further amount in accordance with law would be reserved and this would be also subject to the rights of the respondent to defend such claims, if any, raised.
10. Further in view of the request of the parties, parties are referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Parties shall appear before the mediator through video conferencing on 26.07.2021.
11. It is clarified that in case mediation is not successful, parties may avail of their remedies before appropriate forums.
12. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
13. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.
Court emphasizes the importance of preserving parties' rights while allowing for settlement negotiations under arbitration law.
The court considered the acceptance of payment without prejudice to further claims, and the referral to mediation as a means to resolve the disputes.
A settlement reached between parties renders an arbitral award satisfied, making any appeals regarding the matter infructuous.
The court recognized and gave effect to the full and final settlement between the parties, leading to the satisfaction of the arbitral award and disposal of the appeal.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of adjudicating certain matters through arbitration and the inapplicability of certain contentions for the arbitral proceedings.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, highlighting the importance of abiding by arbitral awards and the need for commercial parties to hon....
The court recognizes and upholds the mutual settlement reached between parties regarding the execution of an arbitral award, directing compliance within a specified timeframe.
Section 9 of the Arbitration Act only permits interim reliefs; final relief claims must be adjudicated by the Arbitral Tribunal.
The court upheld the validity of a Settlement Agreement that modified an arbitration award and waived claims for interest and costs.
The court clarified the impact of the interim award on the final adjudication, the requirement for the Petitioner to deposit the awarded amount, and the allowance for the Petitioner to file an applic....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.