SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
JVL Electronics, Thanjavur - Appellant
Versus
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
FAO 144 of 2021
Decided On : 19-07-2021




Court emphasizes the importance of preserving parties' rights while allowing for settlement negotiations under arbitration law.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Appellant's application dismissed for stay of termination letter and continuation as dealer - Respondent offers payment of Rs. 7,48,262.27 as partial settlement, reserving rights for further claims - Court directs payment and refers parties to mediation. (Paras 2-12)

(B) Compromise and Settlement - Concept of without prejudice negotiations established; any further claims can be pursued in appropriate forums post-mediation. (Para 9)

(C) Mediation - Court encourages resolution of disputes through mediation, allowing parties the opportunity to settle amicably. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
Appellant challenges dismissal of application under arbitration law seeking to stay termination of dealership; subsequent settlement discussions revealed disputes regarding the full nature of claims.

Findings of Court:
Appellant to receive Rs. 7,48,262.27 within four weeks, with all claims reserved for future adjudication.

Issues: The main issues are the validity of the proposed settlement amount and the continuation of claims by the appellant post-settlement.

Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasized that payments made are without prejudice to further claims, underscoring the necessity of preserving rights during settlement discussions and the optional mediation as a means of resolving disputes.

Result: Appeal disposed of with directives for payment and mediation.

Table of Content
1. appellant appeals dismissal of application. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of arbitration application (Para 2 , 3)
3. negotiations and offers made by parties (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. mediation and preservation of rights (Para 8 , 9 , 11)
5. court directs payment and mediation. (Para 10)
6. conclusion and disposal of appeal (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

CM APPLN. 21047/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

FAO 144/2021 & CM APPLN. 21045-46/2021

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Appellant impugns judgment dated 12.02.2021 whereby the application of the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been dismissed.

3. Appellant had sought stay of the termination letter dated 24.12.2020 and had sought permission to continue as the dealer of the respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that during the pendency of these proceedings, subsequent events have occurred whereby the respondent have taken back certain stocks and offered to pay a sum of Rs. 7,40,705.84 by their e-mail dated 17.05.2021 to the appellant in full and final settlement of all his claims. He submits that an application has been filed by the appellant seeking amendment of the prayer clause.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the said amount has been admitted by the respondent, respondent be directed to pay the same. He, however, submits that there are other claims of the appellant which would still survive as the said payment would not be as full and final settlement of all claims of the appellant.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that on further reconciliation of the accounts, a sum of Rs. 7,48,262.27 is being offered to the appellant. He submits that said payment is being offered without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and with a view to resolve the disputes. He further submits that in case appellant has any further claim, appellant may agitate the same before the appropriate forum.

7. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant would accept the said amount without prejudice to the rights and contentions and reserving the rights of the appellant to claim his further amount before the appropriate forum.

8. Further, learned counsel for the parties pray that parties may be given liberty of resolving their disputes through mediation and pray that parties be referred to mediation.

9. In view of the above statement, appeal is disposed of with a direction to respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 7,48,262.27 within a period of four weeks from today. It is clarified that this payment would be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and all rights of the appellant to claim further amount in accordance with law would be reserved and this would be also subject to the rights of the respondent to defend such claims, if any, raised.

10. Further in view of the request of the parties, parties are referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Parties shall appear before the mediator through video conferencing on 26.07.2021.

11. It is clarified that in case mediation is not successful, parties may avail of their remedies before appropriate forums.

12. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

13. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top