SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
JVL Electronics, Thanjavur - Appellant
Versus
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
FAO 144/2021
Decided On : 19-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. B. Karunakaran, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Sandeep Grover, Mr. Aditya Nayyar, Mr. Tarang Agarwal, Advocates, for the Respondents

The court considered the acceptance of payment without prejudice to further claims, and the referral to mediation as a means to resolve the disputes.

Headnote:

Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Dismissal of application seeking stay of termination letter and permission to continue as dealer - Appellant seeks amendment of prayer clause due to subsequent events - Respondent offers payment in full and final settlement of claims - Appellant accepts payment without prejudice to further claims - Parties referred to mediation - Appeal disposed with direction for payment and mediation

Fact of the Case:

The appellant sought stay of a termination letter and permission to continue as the dealer of the respondent. Subsequent events led to the respondent offering a payment in full and final settlement of claims. The appellant sought amendment of the prayer clause and accepted the payment without prejudice to further claims. The parties were referred to mediation.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 7,48,262.27 within four weeks, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. The parties were also referred to mediation, with the option to avail of their remedies before appropriate forums if mediation was not successful.

Issues: Dismissal of application under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, subsequent events leading to amendment of prayer clause, acceptance of payment in full and final settlement of claims, and referral to mediation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the subsequent events and the acceptance of payment without prejudice to further claims, leading to the direction for payment and referral to mediation.

Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of with a direction for payment and referral to mediation, with the option for parties to avail of their remedies before appropriate forums if mediation was not successful.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.:--

CM Appln. 21047/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

FAO 144/2021 & CM APPLN. 21045-46/2021

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Appellant impugns judgment dated 12.02.2021 whereby the application of the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been dismissed.

3. Appellant had sought stay of the termination letter dated 24.12.2020 and had sought permission to continue as the dealer of the respondent.

4. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that during the pendency of these proceedings, subsequent events have occurred whereby the respondent have taken back certain stocks and offered to pay a sum of Rs. 7,40,705.84 by their e-mail dated 17.05.2021 to the appellant in full and final settlement of all his claims. He submits that an application has been filed by the appellant seeking amendment of the prayer clause.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the said amount has been admitted by the respondent, respondent be directed to pay the same. He, however, submits that there are other claims of the appellant which would still survive as the said payment would not be as full and final settlement of all claims of the appellant.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that on further reconciliation of the accounts, a sum of Rs. 7,48,262.27 is being offered to the appellant. He submits that said payment is being offered without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and with a view to resolve the disputes. He further submits that in case appellant has any further claim, appellant may agitate the same before the appropriate forum.

7. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant would accept the said amount without prejudice to the rights and contentions and reserving the rights of the appellant to claim his further amount before the appropriate forum.

8. Further, learned counsel for the parties pray that parties may be given liberty of resolving their disputes through mediation and pray that parties be referred to mediation.

9. In view of the above statement, appeal is disposed of with a direction to respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 7,48,262.27 within a period of four weeks from today. It is clarified that this payment would be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and all rights of the appellant to claim further amount in accordance with law would be reserved and this would be also subject to the rights of the respondent to defend such claims, if any, raised.

10. Further in view of the request of the parties, parties are referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Parties shall appear before the mediator through video conferencing on 26.07.2021.

11. It is clarified that in case mediation is not successful, parties may avail of their remedies before appropriate forums.

12. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

13. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top