SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Annavaram Concrete Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. arbitral award upheld by court (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments on contractual obligations (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court’s reasoning on verification of award (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. conclusion on appeal and directions given (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J. The present appeal under section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 read with section 10 the Delhi High Court Act 1966 and section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (`A&C Act') has been filed by the Union of India, Ministry of Railways and North Eastern Railways (`Railways') impugning judgment dated 27.02.2020 rendered by the learned single Judge of this court in O.M.P. (COMM) No. 112/2020 (`impugned judgment'), whereby the learned single Judge has upheld arbitral award dated 08.02.2011 (`arbitral award') made by the learned Sole Arbitrator in arbitral proceedings between the Railways and M/s Annavaram Concrete Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad (`Annavaram').

2. The Railways had filed a petition under section 34 of the A&C Act challenging arbitral award dated 08.02.2011; in which award the learned Sole Arbitrator had directed the Railways to refund to Annavaram t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top