DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Annavaram Concrete Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitral award upheld by court (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on contractual obligations (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court’s reasoning on verification of award (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. conclusion on appeal and directions given (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J. The present appeal under section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 read with section 10 the Delhi High Court Act 1966 and section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (`A&C Act') has been filed by the Union of India, Ministry of Railways and North Eastern Railways (`Railways') impugning judgment dated 27.02.2020 rendered by the learned single Judge of this court in O.M.P. (COMM) No. 112/2020 (`impugned judgment'), whereby the learned single Judge has upheld arbitral award dated 08.02.2011 (`arbitral award') made by the learned Sole Arbitrator in arbitral proceedings between the Railways and M/s Annavaram Concrete Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad (`Annavaram').
2. The Railways had filed a petition under section 34 of the A&C Act challenging arbitral award dated 08.02.2011; in which award the learned Sole Arbitrator had directed the Railways to refund to Annavaram t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.