SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
SES Energy Services India Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Vendanta Limited - Respondent
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 285 of 2021 & I.A. 10622 of 2021
Decided On : 26-08-2021




The invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee is enforceable irrespective of disputes between parties, and allegations of egregious fraud must be substantiated by evidence affecting the guarantee's foundation.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee - The petitioner seeks interim reliefs against invocation of an unconditional Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG), originally valid till 31-Dec-2020, later extended till 30-Sep-2021, for a contract related to equipment supply for offshore drilling - The court finds that invocation of PBG is not subject to disputes between the parties and requires immediate honoring based on terms of the guarantee - The petitioner argued invocation constituted egregious fraud; however, the court concludes no establishment of fraud affecting the foundation of the guarantee was demonstrated - The court emphasizes the need for trusts in banking transactions, and that fraud must not merely concern invocation but erode the guarantee itself. (Paras 4, 29, 30, 42)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to restrain the respondent from invoking a Performance Bank Guarantee related to agreements executed for offshore facility equipment supply, claiming that no defects were reported and the invocation constituted fraud.

Findings of Court:
The Performance Bank Guarantee was unconditional, and invocation was valid despite disputes; mere allegations of fraud did not meet the threshold for court interference.

Issues: Whether the invocation of the unconditional bank guarantee is justified despite the existing disputes between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: Courts do not interfere with the invocation of unconditional bank guarantees unless established fraud in the foundation of the guarantee is evident; evidence of mere dissatisfaction or disputes does not suffice.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. invocation of bank guarantees. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. unconditional nature of bank guarantees. (Para 4 , 5)
3. conditions under which courts intervene. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. egregious fraud must vitiate contracts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. lack of basis for injunction against invocation. (Para 30 , 38 , 41)
6. dismissal of petition without relief. (Para 42 , 43)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

C. Hari Shankar, J.

(Video-Conferencing)

1. The petitioner seeks pre-arbitral interim reliefs.

2. Three agreements, executed between the petitioner and the respondents, essentially, constitute the basis of the claim in this petition. All the three agreements were executed on the same date, i.e. 20th August, 2018. The petitioner has titled these agreements as the "Principal Agreement, "Domestic Sale Agreement" and "Offshore Sale Agreement". The Principal Agreement was for providing localized separation facility at the Mangala Well Pads of the respondents (used for offshore oil drilling), on Rental and Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Basis, the Domestic Sale Agreement was for supply of two packages for the localized separation facility and the Offshore Sale Agreement was supply of a third package. For the purposes of the present dispute, it is not necessary to delve, in detail, into the specifics of the equipment to be provided under these agreements; suffice it to state that, under the agreements, the petitioner was to supply equipments to the respondent, to be used by the respondents in its offshore drilling facility.

3. The grievance of the petitioner arises from the attempted invocation, by the respondents, of a Performance Bank Guarantee ("PBG", in short), dated 28th August, 2018, furnished by the petitioner to the respondents, in terms of the Principal Agreement. Paras 1 to 3 of the bank guarantee may be reproduced, for ready reference, thus:

    "1. In consideration of Vedanta Limited, a body corporate established under the laws of India, and having its registered office at 1st Floor, `C' Wing, Unit 103, Corporate Avenue, Atul Projects, Chakala, Andheri (East), Mumbai 400093, Maharashtra, India and office at DLF Atria, Jacaranda Marg, DLF City-Phase 2, Gurugram 122002, Haryana, India (hereinafter referred to as "Company", which expression shall, unless repugnant to the context or meaning thereof, including all its successors, administrators, executors and permitted assigns) having entered into a contract no. 42000-11112 dated 9th August, 2018 (hereinafter called the "Contract" which expression shall include all the amendments thereto) with SES Energy Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated and validly existing under the laws of India, having its registered office at Unit No. 101, A-Wing, First Floor, Reliable Tech Park, Thane Belapur Road, Airoli, Navi Mumbai 400708 (hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor", which expression shall unless repugnant to the context or meaning thereof, include all its successors, administrators, executors and permitted assigns). The contract has been executed between the contractor and the company with one of the terms of the contract requiring that the contractor furnishes to the company a bank guarantee to Rs. 22,01,62,360/- (Rupees Twenty Two Crores One Lakh Sixty Two Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Only) guarantee the satisfactory performance by the contractor in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.

    2. We, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., registered under the laws of India, having registered office at 27BKC, C 27, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400051 and acting through its branch office at Center Point, J.B. Nagar, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri (East) Mumbai-400059 (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank", which expression shall, unless repugnant to the context or meaning thereof, include all its successors, administrators, executors and permitted assigns), do hereby guarantee and irrevocably undertake to pay to the company (or if the bank has accepted the assignm













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top