SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Anil Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's pay fixation claims. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding ccs order interpretation. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's agreement with previous interpretation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. entitlement to last drawn basic pay. (Para 8)
5. orders for re-working pay fixation. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral) The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner contending that the respondents have wrongly fixed his basic pay at the rate of Rs.19,680 with grade pay of Rs.5,400 instead of Rs.28,340 with grade pay of Rs.6,600, thereby wrongly implementing Paragraph 8 of the Central Civil Services (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Order, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the `CCS Order').

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was a Major in the Indian Army and was discharged from the services on 15.07.2007. He was appointed as an Assistant Commandant (Medical Officer) in the Central Reserve Police Force, in the pay scale of Rs.15,600 - Rs.39,100 with grade pay of Rs.5,400 vide appointment letter dated 30.06.2006. The petitioner claims that as on the date of his discharge fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top