IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Khadi and Village Industries Commission - Appellant
Versus
JBMR Enterprises - Respondent
CS(COMM) 284 of 2021
Decided On : 04-06-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. exemption applications for court fees (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. filing additional documents under commercial courts act (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. exemption from filing notarized affidavits (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. registration of plaint and issue of summons (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. trademark infringement and counterfeiting allegations (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. granting interim injunction (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
ORDER
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
I.A. 7416/2021 (for exemption)
1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. 7417/2021 (for extension of time for filing Court fee)
3. The present application u/Section 149 and 151 of CPC on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking extension of time for filing Court fee.
4. It is submitted that the Plaintiff, on account of being situated in Mumbai, is unable to transfer the Court fee directly to Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd., as their office is closed. Therefore, leave is sought to file the same upon resumption of regular functioning of the Court.
5. The application is allowed, subject to the Plaintiff filing court fee within two weeks from the day the lockdown restrictions imposed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and the Government of Maharashtra are lifted and the facilities for issuance of court fee stamps is resumed.
6. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. 7415/2021 (u/O 11 Rule 1(4) seeking leave to file additional documents)
7. This is an application seeking leave to file additional documents under the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (in short `Commercial Courts Act').
8. The Plaintiff, if they wish to file additional documents at a later stage, shall do so strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act.
9. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
I.A. 7418/2021 (for exemption from filing notarized affidavits)
10. The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short `CPC') on behalf of the Plaintiff seeks exemption from filing notarized affidavits.
11. The application is allowed, subject to the Plaintiff filing the exempted documents within two weeks from the day the lockdown restrictions imposed by the Government of NCT of Delhi are lifted and the facility for attestation of affidavits is resumed.
12. The application stands disposed of.
CS(COMM) 284/2021
13. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.
14. Upon filing of process fee, issue summons to the Defendant by all permissible modes. Summons shall state that the written statement shall be filed by the Defendant within 30 days from the date of receipt of summons. Along with the written statement, the Defendant shall also file an affidavit of admission/denial of the documents of the Plaintiff, without which the written statement shall not be taken on record.
15. Liberty is given to the Plaintiff to file a replication within 15 days of the receipt of the written statement. Along with the replication, if any, filed by the Plaintiff, an affidavit of admission/denial of documents of the Defendant, be filed by the Plaintiff, without which the replication shall not be taken on record. If any of the parties wish to seek inspection of any documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines.
16. List before the Joint Registrar for marking of exhibits on 9th August, 2021. It is made clear that any party unjustifiably denying documents would be liable to be burdened with costs.
17. List before Court on 10th September, 2021 for framing of issues thereafter.
I.A. 7414/2021 (u/O 39 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 seeking interim injunction)
18. The Plaintiff has filed the present application for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark and copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, damages, delivery-up, etc. The Plaintiff is a statutory body established under t






Plaintiff established a prima facie case for trademark and copyright infringement, necessitating an interim injunction to prevent consumer confusion and irreparable harm.
Plaintiff established a prima facie case of trademark infringement and copyright violation, leading to an injunction against Defendants' unauthorized use of trademarks.
The court established that the use of a similar mark that may cause consumer confusion constitutes trademark infringement and passing off, affirming the Plaintiff's exclusive rights over its register....
The court established that a prima facie case for relief exists when trademark infringement is evident, justifying ex parte interim injunction to prevent irreparable harm.
A plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case of trademark infringement, supported by evidence of prior use and likelihood of consumer confusion to obtain an ex-parte injunction.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the protection of registered trademarks and the grant of interim injunctions to prevent trademark infringement and potential harm to consumers.
The court granted an ad-interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement upon finding a prima facie case of passing off by the defendants, who adopted a deceptively similar mark subsequent....
Trademark infringement claims must prevent confusion in the marketplace, emphasizing the necessity for injunctions when identical marks are used in overlapping services, particularly in a global cont....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.