IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
EL Baik Food Systems Co. S.A. - Appellant
Versus
Arsalan Wahid Gilkar - Respondent
CS(COMM) 283 of 2021
Decided On : 04-06-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. granting of ex-parte injunction (Para 19 , 26) |
| 2. plaintiff's background and trademark registrations (Para 20 , 21) |
| 3. defendants' alleged trademark infringement (Para 22 , 23) |
| 4. establishment of prima facie case and balance of convenience (Para 24 , 25) |
| 5. procedural compliance and hearing schedule (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
ORDER
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
I.A. No. 7388/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. No. 7389/2021 (for seeking exemption from filing attested/apostilled affidavit)
3. The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short `CPC') on behalf of the Plaintiff seeks exemption from filing attested/apostilled affidavits.
4. The Plaintiff submits that due to the COVID-19 pandemic situation and resultant restrictions, they are unable to get the attested/apostilled affidavits. Due to the urgency of the matter, the Plaintiff has filed the present suit without the attested/apostilled affidavits.
5. The application is allowed, subject to the Plaintiff filing the exempted documents within two weeks from the day the lockdown restrictions imposed by the Government of NCT of Delhi are lifted and the facility for attestation of affidavits is resumed.
6. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. 7387/2021 (u/Section 149 r/w Section 151 CPC for seeking extension of time in filing of Court fee and one-time process fee)
7. The present application under Section 149 of the CPC on behalf of the Plaintiff seeks extension of time in filing of court fee and process fee.
8. The Plaintiff submits that due to the current COVID-19 pandemic situation and resultant restrictions, he is unable to procure the necessary court fee stamps. Due to the urgency of the matter, the Plaintiff has filed the subject suit without the court fee and process fee.
9. The application is allowed, subject to the Plaintiff filing the requisite court fee and process fee within two weeks from the day the lockdown restrictions imposed by the Government of NCT of Delhi are lifted and the facility for issuance of court fee stamps is resumed.
10. The application stands disposed of.
I.A. 7386/2021 (u/O XI Rule 1(4) of CPC for seeking leave to file additional documents)
11. The present application seeks leave to file additional documents under the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (in short `Commercial Courts Act').
12. The Plaintiff, if it wishes to file additional documents at a later stage, shall do so strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act.
13. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
CS(COMM) 283/2021
14. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.
15. Upon filing of process fee, issue summons to the Defendants by all permissible modes. Summons shall state that the written statements shall be filed by the Defendants within 30 days from the date of receipt of summons. Along with the written statements, the Defendants shall also file an affidavit of admission/denial of the documents of the Plaintiff, without which the written statements shall not be taken on record.
16. Liberty is given to the Plaintiff to file replications within 15 days of the receipt of the written statements. Along with the replications, if any, filed by the Plaintiff, an affidavit of admission/denial of documents of the Defendants, be filed by the Plaintiff, without which the replications shall not be taken on record. If any of the parties wish to seek inspection of any documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines.
17. List before the Joint Registrar for marking of exhibits on 6th August, 2021. It is made clear that any party unjustifiably denying documents would be liable to be burdened with costs.
18. List before the Court on 10th September, 2021. I.A. 7385/2021 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for a
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |


Plaintiff established a prima facie case of trademark infringement and copyright violation, leading to an injunction against Defendants' unauthorized use of trademarks.
Plaintiff established a prima facie case for trademark and copyright infringement, necessitating an interim injunction to prevent consumer confusion and irreparable harm.
Trademark infringement claims must prevent confusion in the marketplace, emphasizing the necessity for injunctions when identical marks are used in overlapping services, particularly in a global cont....
A plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case of trademark infringement, supported by evidence of prior use and likelihood of consumer confusion to obtain an ex-parte injunction.
The court established that a prima facie case for relief exists when trademark infringement is evident, justifying ex parte interim injunction to prevent irreparable harm.
The court upheld that protecting registered trademarks from potentially infringing use requires establishing a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and potential for irreparable harm.
Trademark infringement occurs when a mark is deceptively similar to a registered trademark, causing consumer confusion, which justifies injunctive relief.
The court granted an ad-interim injunction for trademark and copyright infringement upon finding a prima facie case of passing off by the defendants, who adopted a deceptively similar mark subsequent....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.