SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Tamil Nadu Tele-Communication Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Railtel Corporation of India Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual basis of the dispute (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. claims of defects and demand for replacements (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. summary of railtel's claims (Para 18)
4. ttl's arguments against the award (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court's affirmation of tribunal's findings (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner (hereafter `TTL') has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the `A&C Act') impugning an Arbitral Award dated 03.10.2012 (hereafter the `impugned award') rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator.

2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in connection with the purchase of 559 kms of 24 Fibre Armoured Optical Fibre Cable. TTL is a manufacturer of Optical Fibre Cables (hereafter `OFC') and supplies the said product to various government and non-government agencies in India as well as overseas. It is stated that petitioner uses the Fujikura brand fibre to manufacture the OFC and, has supplied over 3000 kms. of OFC to the Railways since the past decade.

3. The disputes in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top