IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Anmol Kumar Mishra (Minor) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 13146 of 2021 with CM Appl. 41448 of 2021
Decided On : 29-11-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's visual impairment and admission details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding validity of temporary disability certificates. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis on the eligibility criteria for pwd admissions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. conclusion quashing the communication and allowing admission. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)--The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through hybrid mode [physical and virtual hearing].
1. Notice in the present petition was issued on 23.11.2021. Mr. Arjun Mitra, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3-Indian Institute of Technology ["IIT"], Kharagpur and Joint Seat Allocation Authority (JoSAA) 2021 respectively, has taken instructions and submits that no counter affidavit is required. The petition can, therefore, be decided on the documents on record, and is taken up for hearing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks admission to IIT, Kharagpur for the Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering Dual Degree (B.Tech. plus M.Tech.) course. He suffers from a condition of visual impairment called keratoconus, and applied for admission in the category of Persons with Disability ["PwD"]. He was admitted to the course of his choice pursuant to the Joint Entrance Examination ["JEE"] conducted by the respondents. However, his admission was cancelled, as reflected on the admissions portal on 31.10.2021, and communicated to him by a communication dated 09.11.2021. The reason stated for the rejection of his candidature is that the disability certificate submitted by him mentions that his disability is temporary and "likely to improve".
Facts
3. The factual position is undisputed. The petitioner suffers from keratoconus, and originally submitted a disability certificate dated 14.01.2021, issued by the Issuing Medical Authority, South West, Delhi, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India. The certificate records that he has a 40% temporary disability in relation to both eyes as per the guidelines for assessing the extent of specified disability under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 dated 04.01.2018 ["the Guidelines"] issued by the Government of India. The certificate is stated to be valid for one year, i.e. until 14.01.2022.
4. The petitioner was unsure of whether he satisfies the eligibility criteria of the PwD category and, therefore, addressed an email dated 21.04.2021 to each of the IITs. He mentioned in the said email that he has a certificate from a government hospital to the effect that he has 40% temporary disability under the "low vision" category, and that the certificate is valid for one year after which he has to re-check his disability and would be given a permanent disability certificate at that stage, if he qualifies. IIT, Kharagpur is the organizing institution for the JEE (Advanced) this year. The JEE office in IIT, Kharagpur informed the petitioner by an email dated 22.04.2021 that he is eligible to get a seat under the PwD category, subject to a valid PwD certificate and other eligibility criteria. He was asked to submit a PwD certificate with 40% disability in Form-II of the brochure of the JEE (Advanced) 2021 ["the brochure"]. An email received from IIT, Bombay has also been placed on record, which shows that the petitioner was told that he was eligible under the PwD category, subject to submission of a valid PwD certificate. However, in this email, he was directed to submit a certificate in Form-IV.
5. The petitioner was allotted a seat in the PwD category in the course of his choice and opted to "freeze his choice", rather than to be considered for upgradation in subsequent rounds of allotment. He was required to have his PwD status verified, which was done at IIT, Kharagpur on 21.10.2021. An endorsement was made on his PwD category certificate,
Temporary disabilities should not disqualify individuals from accessing benefits under disability categories, aligning with the long-term impairment focus of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities A....
The Act and the Guidelines for evaluation and certification of specified disabilities do not distinguish between temporary and permanent disabilities in the context of visual impairment, and must be ....
The court ruled that a temporary disability certificate suffices for admission under PWD category for candidates under 18, as permanent certificates are not mandated by law until the age of 18.
Only individuals with permanent disabilities qualify for reservation benefits, while temporary disabilities do not meet the legal benchmarks set by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act.
Exclusion from admission despite valid disability certification violates rights and mandates of reasonable accommodation under disability laws.
The Act mandates that only individuals with permanent disabilities meet the benchmark for reservation in employment, excluding those with temporary disabilities from eligibility.
Disability quantification should not disqualify candidates from medical education; functional competency must be assessed for eligibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.