SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Anmol Kumar Mishra (Minor) - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 13146 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 41448 of 2021
Decided On : 29-11-2021

Advocates appeared:
Md. Nizamuddin Pasha, Advocate, Aditya Samaddar, Advocate, Rishabh Sahu, Advocate, Arjun Mitra, Advocate

The Act and the Guidelines for evaluation and certification of specified disabilities do not distinguish between temporary and permanent disabilities in the context of visual impairment, and must be interpreted liberally to fulfill the objectives of the beneficial legislation for the benefit of PwDs.

Headnote:

Disability - Admission to Educational Institution - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 32 - Guidelines for evaluation and certification of specified disabilities - Clause 19.2 - Clause 19.3

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought admission to IIT, Kharagpur for a dual degree course but had his admission cancelled due to a temporary disability. The petitioner suffers from keratoconus and holds a temporary disability certificate valid until 14.01.2022. The petitioner was initially informed of his eligibility under the PwD category, but his candidature was later rejected based on the temporary nature of his disability.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's case is merited under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and the Guidelines for evaluation and certification of specified disabilities. The court held that the Act and the Guidelines do not distinguish between temporary and permanent disabilities in the context of visual impairment, and the petitioner's temporary disability falls within the category for pursuing education.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's temporary disability should disqualify him from availing reservation under the PwD category for admission to the educational institution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the Act and the Guidelines liberally, emphasizing that the Act is a beneficial legislation for the benefit of PwDs and must be construed to fulfill its objectives. The court held that the impugned communication tended to adopt a restrictive interpretation inconsistent with the legislative scheme.

Final Decision: The writ petition succeeded, and the impugned communication of the respondents dated 09.11.2021 was quashed. The respondents were directed to take necessary consequential steps forthwith. No order as to costs was given.

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. - The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through hybrid mode [physical and virtual hearing].

1. Notice in the present petition was issued on 23.11.2021. Mr. Arjun Mitra, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3-Indian Institute of Technology ["IIT"], Kharagpur and Joint Seat Allocation Authority (JoSAA) 2021 respectively, has taken instructions and submits that no counter affidavit is required. The petition can, therefore, be decided on the documents on record, and is taken up for hearing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks admission to IIT, Kharagpur for the Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering Dual Degree (B.Tech. plus M.Tech.) course. He suffers from a condition of visual impairment called keratoconus, and applied for admission in the category of Persons with Disability ["PwD"]. He was admitted to the course of his choice pursuant to the Joint Entrance Examination ["JEE"] conducted by the respondents. However, his admission was cancelled, as reflected on the admissions portal on 31.10.2021, and communicated to him by a communication dated 09.11.2021. The reason stated for the rejection of his candidature is that the disability certificate submitted by him mentions that his disability is temporary and "likely to improve".

Facts

3. The factual position is undisputed. The petitioner suffers from keratoconus, and originally submitted a disability certificate dated 14.01.2021, issued by the Issuing Medical Authority, South West, Delhi, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India. The certificate records that he has a 40% temporary disability in relation to both eyes as per the guidelines for assessing the extent of specified disability under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 dated 04.01.2018 ["the Guidelines"] issued by the Government of India. The certificate is stated to be valid for one year, i.e. until 14.01.2022.

4. The petitioner was unsure of whether he satisfies the eligibility criteria of the PwD category and, therefore, addressed an email dated 21.04.2021 to each of the IITs. He mentioned in the said email that he has a certificate from a government hospital to the effect that he has 40% temporary disability under the "low vision" category, and that the certificate is valid for one year after which he has to re-check his disability and would be given a permanent disability certificate at that stage, if he qualifies. IIT, Kharagpur is the organizing institution for the JEE (Advanced) this year. The JEE office in IIT, Kharagpur informed the petitioner by an email dated 22.04.2021 that he is eligible to get a seat under the PwD category, subject to a valid PwD certificate and other eligibility criteria. He was asked to submit a PwD certificate with 40% disability in Form-II of the brochure of the JEE (Advanced) 2021 ["the brochure"]. An email received from IIT, Bombay has also been placed on record, which shows that the petitioner was told that he was eligible under the PwD category, subject to submission of a valid PwD certificate. However, in this email, he was directed to submit a certificate in Form-IV.

5. The petitioner was allotted a seat in the PwD category in the course of his choice and opted to "freeze his choice", rather than to be considered for upgradation in subsequent rounds of allotment. He was required to have his PwD status verified, which was done at IIT, Kharagpur on 21.10.2021. An endorsement was made on his PwD category certificate, which reads as follows: -

    "Documents verified. Temporary disability of 40% (Forty percent) due to low vision due to B/L Keratoconus which valid upto 14.01.2022."

    This was also reflected in the status on the admissions portal.

    6. The petitioner was thereafter asked to submit the certificate in Form-IV, which he obtained from DDU Hospital, Harinagar, New Delhi on 03.09.2021. The certificate w

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top