SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Sandeep Kumar Varma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to disciplinary proceedings and appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's observation on appeal processing. (Para 5)
3. order for expediting appeal decision. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):

C.M.No.45689/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 14520/2021

1. Present writ petition has been filed primarily challenging the charge sheet dated 24th January, 2017 and the order dated 16th October, 2020.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Disciplinary Authority had passed the order dated 16th October, 2020 against the petitioner imposing a penalty of compulsory retirement with due benefits.

3. Aggrieved by the order dated 16th October, 2020, the petitioner preferred an appeal before Additional Chief Safety Commissioner on 26th December 2020. He states that since no response was received, the petitioner approached this Court by filing a writ petition, being W.P(C) 4484 of 2021, whereby this Court, vide order 13th April 2021, directed the Appellate Authority to decide the petitioner's appeal by way of a reasoned order as expeditiously as possible, preferably wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top