IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Siyad M – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 2680 of 2023 & CM APPL. 10351 of 2023
Decided On : 17-03-2023
HRA - Writ Petition - The court disposed of the petition directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide based on similar cases within six weeks.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought various reliefs including the grant of full HRA, quashing of office orders, and recovery of HRA allowance.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the petition, directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide based on similar cases within six weeks.
Issues: The issues raised in the present petition were similar to those in previous cases where similar reliefs were granted.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous cases where similar reliefs were granted and directed the respondents to decide the present petition based on those cases.
Final Decision: The present petition along with pending application is disposed of, with the direction to treat it as a representation and decide based on similar cases within six weeks.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:
"a.) lssue a writ mandamus directing the respondent to grant full HRA w.e.f. 03.07.2021;
b.) Pass a writ of Certiorari for quashing and set aside the office order dated 03.02.2023 vide which recovery of 5% of HRA allowance which had been paid to the petitioner for first six months of his tenure (qua petitioner only);
c.) Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing and set aside the impugned order dated 17.01.2023of the respondents through which they rejected the plea of the petitioner for grant of full HRA 27% w.e.f. 01.01.2021 to till date as the same is illegal and ultra-virus to the constitution of India;
d.) Pass a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant Full HRA to the petitioner whenever the respondents are unable to give family accommodation at the place of posting;
e.) Direct the respondents to pay entire arrears of 5% along with 18% interest from the date it became due and payable or w.e.f. 03.07.2021 (if recovery made) otherwise from 01.01.2022;
f.) To direct the respondents to pay cost of this litigation."
2. Learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that the issues raised in the present petition are no more res integra as this Court in Brijesh Kumar vs. Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, W.P.(C) 4839/2019 decided on 18.12.2019 has granted similar reliefs and also in the following cases, the same reliefs have been granted:
(i) Ram Surat Singh vs. Director General CISF & Anr., W.P.(C) 4148/2021 decided on 05.04.2021
(ii) Chandra Prakash Singh vs. Director General CISF & Anr., W.P.(C) 4149/2021 decided on 05.04.2021,
(iii) Surender Pal Singh vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Home & Ors., W.P.(C) 9853/2021 decided on 08.09.2021,
(ii) Mohammed Isham vs. Union of India And Ors., W.P.(C) 13442/2021 decided on 06.01.2022.
3. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation and decide the same based on the lines of aforementioned cases within six weeks.
4. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter.
5. The present petition along with pending application is disposed of.
6. Needless to state that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.
The court ruled that under CISF Rules, when accommodation is unavailable, full HRA must be granted, and existing judgments support the petitioner's claim for arrears and interest.
A petition challenging a dismissal for lack of cause cannot proceed without a prior specific order invoked, allowing withdrawal to pursue direct challenges.
Interpretation of Rule 61 of the CISF Rules, 2001 and the entitlement of employees to full House Rent Allowance based on previous court judgments.
The court upheld that a retired officer could not claim Housing Rent Allowance past the effective date of new policy applicable only to active officers, following prior withdrawals of legal remedies.
Personnel are entitled to full house rent and transport allowances when family accommodations are not provided, ensuring equal treatment under employment rules.
Recovery of excess HRA impermissible from Class III/IV employees without fault, when paid per employer's order later cancelled; authorities responsible for erroneous disbursement cannot recover retro....
Procedural fairness and the requirement for a Show Cause Notice before taking adverse action were central to the court's decision.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.