SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Esic Medical Laboratory Technologists Association – Appellant
Versus
Director General Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. procedural aspects of the writ petition (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding recruitment processes and rules (Para 5)
3. court's observations on interim relief and procedural rights (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. closure of pending applications (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM No. 46508/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 14781/2021 and CM Nos.46509-10/2021

2. Issue notice.

2.1. Mr Shlok Chandra accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

2.2. Mr Chandra says that he does not wish to file a counter-affidavit in the writ petition, in view of the order that we propose to pass.

3. Thus, with the consent of counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at this stage itself.

4. This writ petition is directed against an interlocutory order dated 10.12.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [in short " the Tribunal"] in O.A. No.2865/2021.

4.1. A perusal of the impugned order dated 10.12.2021 shows that notice in the original application i.e., O.A. No. 2865/2021 has been issued. The Tribunal has fixed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top