Wearwell (India) Private Limited vs Mohd. Nizam

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Wearwell (India) Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Nizam – Respondent

Table of Content
1. challenge of orders under the payment of wages act (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. overview of the appellate court's assessment of the settlement (Para 8 , 10)
3. legality and binding nature of settlements outside court (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16)
4. confirmation of settlements in the absence of counterclaims (Para 15 , 17 , 19)
5. final order to refund the deposit based on settlement (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 5850/2022 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

3. The present writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 7th August, 2020 in RCA No. 53/2019 titled Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Mohd. Nizam, passed by the D&SJ, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter "Appellate Court"). Vide the impugned order the appeal against the order dated 29th November, 2018 in PWA No. 73/2018 titled Mohd. Nizam v. M/s Wear Well India Pvt. Ltd., passed by Addl. D&SJ, POLC-V, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (hereinafter "Authority") under the section 15(2), PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT , 1936 (hereinafte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTPRATHIBA M.SINGHWearwell (India) Private Limited – AppellantVersusMohd. Nizam – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Wearwell (India) Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Nizam – Respondent