Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Wearwell (India) Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Raju – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of employment and settlements (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. authority's decision on claims (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. settlement terms and implications (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments against appellate court's ruling (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. validity of out-of-court settlements (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. court's acceptance of the settlement (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. conclusion and order for refund (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
CM APPL.6263/2022 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
WP(C) 2184/2022 & CM APPL.6262/2022 (for stay)
3. The present writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 7th August, 2020 in RCA No. 63/2019 titled M/s. Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Raju passed by the District & Sessions Judge, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter "Appellate Court"). Vide the impugned order, the appeal against the order dated 30th November, 2018 in PWA No. 74/2018 titled Sh. Raju v. M/s Wear Well India Pvt. Ltd. passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge, POLC-V, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (hereinafter "Authority") under the Section 15 (2) of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
