GAURANG KANTH
National Coop. Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Its Workmen, Represented By Del. Lab. Union – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Gaurang Kanth, J.]
1. The case at hand is a Writ Petition preferred under Article 226/227 of The Constitution of India. Petitioner No.1/The National Cooperative Union of India & Petitioner No.2/The management of National Cooperative Printing Press in the present case are aggrieved by the Award dated 03.09.2001 as corrected on 31.07.2003 passed by the Industrial Tribunal No. III, Delhi in I.D. No. 274/87 titled as The Management of M/s National Cooperative Printing Press, 4/2 Kirti Nagar Industrial Area, New Delhi and M/s National Cooperative Union of India, 3 Siri Institutional Area, Panchsheel Marg (behind Haus Khas), New Delhi-16 and Its Workmen as represented by Delhi General Udyog Karamchari Sangh (Regd.) G-119, Karampura, Najafgarh Road, New Delhi-15 (“impugned award”).
2. In the impugned award, learned Labour Court has held that the workmen were entitled to the same grades and pay scales and other facilities, i.e. HRA, CCA, DA, LTC, etc. which were given to their counterparts in Government Printing Press, w.e.f. 01.04.1982. Being aggrieved by the said decision, the Petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate w
The Workmen of Hindustan Lever Ltd & Ors v. The Management of Hindustan Lever Ltd.
State of Uttaranchal v. Jagpal Singh Tyagi
Jaihind Roadways v. Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport & General Kamgar Union & Ors.
Tulsipur Sugar Company Ltd. v. State of U.P & Ors.
Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. Management of Dimakuchi Tea Estate
Settlement agreements under Section 18 of the Industrial Disputes Act bind only parties to those agreements; unrecognized unions cannot enforce them or claim benefits without evidence of participatio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that settlements entered into in Industrial Disputes are valid and legal, even though provisions similar to Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC do not exist in ....
The court reinforced that a settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act cannot override the existing statutory rights of workers to claim wages resulting from illegal closure, as stipulated in the t....
Settlements of wage disputes outside conciliation are valid and binding; a workman's absence in confirming does not invalidate the agreement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity and binding nature of settlements in industrial disputes, even if not confirmed by both parties, under Section 18(1) of the ID Act.
Settlements under the Payment of Wages Act and the Industrial Disputes Act are binding, even if not acknowledged by one party, provided they are legally sound and voluntarily entered into.
The Tribunal must conduct a thorough evidentiary analysis to justify decisions concerning wage revisions and additional allowances under the Industrial Disputes Act, ensuring all material evidence is....
Industrial settlements are binding package deals promoting peace; fraud requires specific proof and timely protest; employee status continues post suspension notice assuring protection until valid vo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.