Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Wearwell (India) Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of the impugned order and background of disputes (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's analysis of settlement confirmation (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. validity of out-of-court settlements (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. recognition of signed settlements and court's discretion (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. refund order based on settlement (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
CM APPL.6256/2022 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
WP(C) 2180/2022 & CM APPL.6255/2022 (for stay)
3. The present writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 7th August, 2020 in RCA No. 52/2019 titled Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Praveen Kumar passed by the District & Sessions Judge, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter "Appellate Court"). Vide the impugned order the appeal against the order dated 24th November, 2018 in PWA No. 56/2018 titled Sh. Praveen Kumar v. M/s Wear Well India Pvt. Ltd. passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge, POLC-V, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (hereinafter "Authority") under the Section 15 (2) of the PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT , 1936 (her
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
